Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Background: Some boring but quick note about terminology.
Relationship: the actual pair of object linked by a relation.
Example (from AGROVOC): [Welfare economic] Study [Mixed economies]
Relation: the binding between two objects, in “general”.
Example (from AGROVOC): Study
I say “general” meaning 1) all pairs of objects linked (extensional
definition), and 2) name and definition of the relation (intensional
definition).
As for the action triggered by clicking “delete” relation, something did
actually happen:
the relation’s _label_ disappeared (see attach "deleted_relation"), but the
actual relationships still exist (see attach "existing_relationship").
Cf. in sandbox: [Welfare economic] _no label _ [Mixed economies]
I think the action "delete" in module "Relationships" should not behave like
that. But, on the one hand, if it only removes labels, relationships are messed
up. On the other hand, removing relationships is a delicate matter. To be
discussed.
Original comment by caterina...@gmail.com
on 8 Mar 2012 at 3:52
Attachments:
It seems that you deleted a relationship type and NOT the relationship between
the two concepts!
In order to delete a relationship between two concepts you should go to the
concept, then on the right part click on 'Relationships' tab, then click on the
[-] button next to the concept of which you wish to delete the relationship.
Original comment by gudrun.j...@fao.org
on 9 Mar 2012 at 7:42
Yes, that's exactly what happenes.
At this point I wander if when clicking "delete" in the "relationships" module,
one should get a warning message. After all it is a risky operation with no
undo!
The warning message could say that the corresponding relationships will stay,
but wth no label, and/or mentioning the number of relationships potentiallly
affected. What I have in mind now is the case of 0 relationships present. In
that case deleting a relation from that module is a safe operation.
Original comment by caterina...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2012 at 9:45
Original comment by sachit.r...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2013 at 2:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
caterina...@gmail.com
on 5 Mar 2012 at 2:48