Closed danielskovli closed 4 months ago
This has been implemented as a proposal in branch feature/subform
for both app-localtest and altinn-storage.
The functionality has been verified in app-localtest
, but as always the testing in altinn-storage
is a bit more elusive.
@SandGrainOne Do you see any immediate concerns with the approach taken by the two commits linked above? I can't imagine this resulting in a breaking change, since we're going from pseudo-random to ordered results, but I also don't have the whole perspective on situations like these.
As for unit testing in altinn-storage
, I can't even get them to run so I haven't been able to do much validation there.
Running Storage and the integration tests require a pre configured PostgreSQL database. I can understand it's a bit of a hassle.
The change looks safe enough. Nothing I know of is sensitive to the order of data elements.
Running Storage and the integration tests require a pre configured PostgreSQL database. I can understand it's a bit of a hassle.
@SandGrainOne What needs to be configured? Does anything need to be populated in the DB for the tests to run? Is there a setup guide somewhere?
@HauklandJ Start with the readme: https://github.com/Altinn/altinn-storage/#setting-up-postgresql
The setup guide we have is for Events, but the pattern is identical. All use of events
should be replaced with storage
. E.g eventsdb
becomes storagedb
and so on.
InstancesController.Get
returns an instance object containing adata
property. This property is an array of objects, in seemingly random order.To be fair, the order is consistent between reloads, but otherwise completely useless.
We wish for the order of this list to be based on the timestamp when the associated dataElement was created, in ascending order.