AmitGarg007 / namebench

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/namebench
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

"Argument of type 'bool' is not iterable" #129

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Launch namebench
2. Write more than one nameservers, comma-separated
3. Start benchmark

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
XML file

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Error at the end: "Argument of type bool is not iterable"

Please provide any additional information below.

Here the log file:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "libnamebench\tk.pyc", line 120, in run
  File "libnamebench\base_ui.pyc", line 154, in RunAndOpenReports
  File "libnamebench\base_ui.pyc", line 200, in CreateReports
  File "libnamebench\reporter.pyc", line 196, in CreateReport
  File "libnamebench\reporter.pyc", line 321, in _GenerateNameServerSummary
  File "libnamebench\url_map.pyc", line 39, in CreateNoteUrlTuples
  File "libnamebench\url_map.pyc", line 31, in GetUrlForNote
TypeError: argument of type 'bool' is not iterable
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "libnamebench\tk.pyc", line 120, in run
  File "libnamebench\base_ui.pyc", line 154, in RunAndOpenReports
  File "libnamebench\base_ui.pyc", line 200, in CreateReports
  File "libnamebench\reporter.pyc", line 196, in CreateReport
  File "libnamebench\reporter.pyc", line 321, in _GenerateNameServerSummary
  File "libnamebench\url_map.pyc", line 39, in CreateNoteUrlTuples
  File "libnamebench\url_map.pyc", line 31, in GetUrlForNote
TypeError: argument of type 'bool' is not iterable

Original issue reported on code.google.com by subvert...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2010 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I'm using Win7 x32

Original comment by subvert...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2010 at 10:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Thanks - I have not seen this bug yet. Somehow, a note of True/False is being 
stored, rather than a string. Very 
strange. Is this crash repeatable?

Original comment by helixblue on 5 Jun 2010 at 10:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
The issues is reproducible. It seems that it happens when the nameserver list 
containt 
at least 1 healthy server and at least 1 non-healthy server.

For me always with this input: 8.8.8.8, 62.101.93.101

To speedup untick "include global dns providers" and "include best regional..." 
and set  
queries to 10. This does not change the behavior.

Original comment by subvert...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2010 at 11:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Thanks for the bug report and screenshot. I think I have fixed the bug in r983  
- can you download 1.3.1-RC1 to 
see if it works properly for you?

http://namebench.googlecode.com/files/namebench-1.3.1-RC1-Windows.exe

Thanks!

Original comment by helixblue on 5 Jun 2010 at 5:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Issue 131 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by helixblue on 5 Jun 2010 at 6:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I've now posted 1.3.1-RC2 which should fix this issue - 
http://code.google.com/p/namebench/downloads/list - 
please let me know how it works for you.

Original comment by helixblue on 5 Jun 2010 at 6:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Still failing, but with a different error.  See attached.

Original comment by gene.spa...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2010 at 6:55

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
This issue was closed by revision r990.

Original comment by thomas.r...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2010 at 7:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Based on your bug reports, I was able to finally nail down the core of the 
issue. It was a change of API that I 
didn't change everywhere. In the case of a DNS server that we were not able to 
do cache-sharing checks on. Try 
1.3.1-RC3:

http://code.google.com/p/namebench/downloads/list

Original comment by helixblue on 5 Jun 2010 at 8:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Yes, that seems to have fixed it -- thanks.

Original comment by gene.spa...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2010 at 11:00