Open stefjoosten opened 3 years ago
The script @RieksJ supplied in issue #834 should be included in the regresssion testset.
This is a double of #1168
As this is a duplicate of another issue as @hanjoosten mentioned above.. I propose to close the issue here.
What happened
I remember that when we discussed the concept
ONE
in prehistoric times, we decided not to have a syntax for its atom. The idea was that we thought we didn't need it. So we decided to leave it out until the need arose. That need actually arose in issue #834.Desired feature
Introduce the identifier
ONE
(without quotes!) to denote the atom contained in conceptONE
.