I'm not entirely certain of the utility of this vs. the novelty, but I've added simple logic for a "Quick Fix" of BUFFER_VIEW_TARGET_MISSING.
@lexaknyazev I hope the logic here isn't too simplistic for what it's doing. It expects BUFFER_VIEW_TARGET_MISSING to have been issued on either a primitive attribute or a primitive's indices, and then expects the value at that JSON pointer to be the ID of a valid accessor with a bufferView ID included, and expects that bufferView to be in need of a target of type determined by whether the original key was indices or not, and inserts the value there.
This now offers an option to fix all bufferViews in the file.
There is an additional QuickFix for ACCESSOR_JOINTS_USED_ZERO_WEIGHT.
I'm not entirely certain of the utility of this vs. the novelty, but I've added simple logic for a "Quick Fix" of
BUFFER_VIEW_TARGET_MISSING
.@lexaknyazev I hope the logic here isn't too simplistic for what it's doing. It expects
BUFFER_VIEW_TARGET_MISSING
to have been issued on either a primitive attribute or a primitive's indices, and then expects the value at that JSON pointer to be the ID of a valid accessor with abufferView
ID included, and expects that bufferView to be in need of atarget
of type determined by whether the original key wasindices
or not, and inserts the value there.This now offers an option to fix all bufferViews in the file.
There is an additional QuickFix for ACCESSOR_JOINTS_USED_ZERO_WEIGHT.
The README has been updated to explain the Quick Fixes.