Analyticsphere / metricsReportsRequests

Used to provide issue tracking for changes and additions to the Connect Metrics reporting.
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Bio Weekly- UChicago Clincal Collection Metrics #149

Open erincschwartz opened 1 month ago

erincschwartz commented 1 month ago

Metrics that we expect to UChicago added to: Table 1.3: Baseline Clinical Biospecimen Collections by Clinic Location (list out each location) • Table 2.2: Baseline Clinical Biospecimen Collection Completeness by Specimen Type • Table 2.9: Baseline- Total Blood Tubes Collected Among Clinical Biospecimen Collections • Table 2.10: Baseline Blood Tubes Collected Among Clinical Biospecimen Collections by Tube Type o Add to footer for UCM: (4) SFH: 2 SST, 1 Heparin, 1 EDTA • Table 3.2: Baseline Biospecimen Survey Status Among Clinical Collections • Table 3.5: Baseline Biospecimen Survey Completion Time from Clinical Collection Dashboard Entry • Table 3.9: Baseline Biospecimen Survey Completion Length (in Minutes) Among Submitted Clinical Surveys (Post-COVID-19 Questions Removal) • Table 4.5: Baseline- Time (in Days) from Verification to Clinical Collection Among Participants Verified Before 2/01/2023 (please also add HP and Sanford to this table----thinking this through again, they may have had particiapnts verified before 2/1/2023 that opt for Clincial Collection once they know it is an option) • Table 4.6: Baseline- Time (in Days) from Verification to Clinical Collection Among Participants Verified on or After 2/01/2023 • Table 5.3: Baseline Collection-To-Receipt Time (in Days) Among Clinical Collections • Table 5.4: Baseline Collection-To-Receipt Time (in Days) Among Clinical Collections by Clinic Location (list out each location) • Table 5.6: Baseline- Time (in Hours) from Clinical Collection to Receipt by Clinic Location (list out each location)

New Tables/Figures needed: •New table needed, will be Table 1.9: Baseline Collection Setting Among Biospecimen Collections by Specimen Type, University of Chicago Medicine • Update needed to: Figure 5.4: Baseline Collection-To-Receipt Time (in Hours), University of Chicago Medicine--make this: Figure 5.4: Baseline Collection-To-Receipt Time (in Hours), University of Chicago Medicine Research Setting • New Figure needed, will be 5.5: Baseline Collection-To-Receipt Time (in Hours), University of Chicago Medicine, Clinical Setting • New Figure needed, will be Figure 6.6: Baseline− Weekly Biospecimen Collections by Collection Setting, University of Chicago Medicine • New Figure needed, will be Figure 6.8: Baseline- Weekly Clinical Biospecimen Collections by Clinic Location, University of Chicago Medicine

Footnote Updates: Tables 4.8 and 4.9 add UChicago (and Sanford) to exclusion list with HP

NOTE: UChicago should also be excluded in the QC rule: a. Custom QC Report (pdf report) • Rule Bio Metric - Distribution Curves for Research Collection Visit Length #18 and Bio Metric - Weekly Biospecimen Data Tables #19: IF BioClin_BldOrderPlaced_v1r0/BioClin_UrnOrdPlaced = 1, THEN BioClin_BldOrderPlacdDt_v1r0/BioClin_BldOrderPlacdDt_v1r0 must be populated. HP Excluded.

erincschwartz commented 1 month ago

@KELSEYDOWLING7 Crosswalk for UChicago clinical collection locations is below:

South Loop (location id = 1) Orland Park (location id = 2) Kenwood (location id = 3) River East (location id = 4) Dearborn Station (location id = 5)

KELSEYDOWLING7 commented 4 weeks ago

@erincschwartz I don't think that's right...We already have Blood Location ID (d_173836415_d_266600170_d_185243482) ==1,2,3 and Urine Location ID (d_173836415_d_266600170_d_452847912) ==1,2,3 for HP locations

erincschwartz commented 4 weeks ago

@KELSEYDOWLING7 The crosswalk info above is what Nina sent to Madhuri and looking at their first clinical collection, they sent BioClin_SiteBldLocBL_v1r0 = 1 (that collection was at South Loop). Do we need to tell Chicago that they need new designations for their clincal collection locations since HP already took 1,2,3?

KELSEYDOWLING7 commented 4 weeks ago

@erincschwartz That's correct, those values are already taken. It looks like the DD was incorrectly updated so I just emailed Rebecca to change that as well

KELSEYDOWLING7 commented 2 weeks ago

@erincschwartz

image image

Should 2.9 have an updated footnote matching 2.10? image image image image image

Table 4.5 includes all clinical sites, but there are no matching collections for HP, SF, or UC

image

(Table 5.3) image image

image image image image

image

Excluded from the QC rules:
"IF BioClin_BldOrderPlaced_v1r0/BioClin_UrnOrdPlaced = 1, THEN BioClin_BldOrderPlacdDt_v1r0/BioClin_BldOrderPlacdDt_v1r0 must be populated. HP Exclude.". Reflected in today's Biospecimen QC

erincschwartz commented 2 weeks ago

@KELSEYDOWLING7; just reviewed and have a few notes:

KELSEYDOWLING7 commented 2 weeks ago

@erincschwartz Thanks for reviewing so quickly image image image image

image

erincschwartz commented 2 weeks ago

@KELSEYDOWLING7 Everything looks good.

Just checking, in Figure 6.8, I assume Dearborn Stations collection is overed up by the South Loop dot, correct?

KELSEYDOWLING7 commented 2 weeks ago

@erincschwartz Great! Yes, Dearborn had 1 on 6/3 but not on 6/10. I can also update the graph to include 0 on the y axis if you want to see that line always continue

erincschwartz commented 2 weeks ago

@KELSEYDOWLING7 add as-is for now and please work to add the 0 for next automation

KELSEYDOWLING7 commented 2 weeks ago

@erincschwartz Right now the only way to set Figure 6.8 to 0 is including all Site locations and having all of them set to 0 until the first collection. Do we want that, or is it ok as is? Once the collections are consistent the lines will be as well (see current Figure 6.13 for example)