Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I meant to log it as an enhancement... not a defect.
Original comment by spam%bol...@gtempaccount.com
on 7 Aug 2007 at 10:22
Hi, perhaps this sproc could be replaced with a SubSonic query? Can you please
investigate?
Original comment by gavinjo...@gmail.com
on 8 Aug 2007 at 12:49
Do you want to drop sp's in favor of queries performed on the app layer?
Original comment by simone.b...@gmail.com
on 30 Sep 2007 at 11:26
Doesn't most of the SPs use row_number for paging?
We could rewrite them to use SubSonic's paging right?
Or is there a SQL Server 2000 function that we can use to create alternate SQL
scripts with the same functionality?
Original comment by james.e....@gmail.com
on 2 Oct 2007 at 12:28
I think we should go with Subsonic queries.
Original comment by simone.b...@gmail.com
on 2 Oct 2007 at 1:12
We should use SubSonic queries wherever we can. If you can replace a sproc with
one,
please do so.
Once SubSonic migrations are available, we can replace the create db sql
scripts with
SubSonic migrations.
Original comment by gavinjo...@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2007 at 8:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
spam%bol...@gtempaccount.com
on 7 Aug 2007 at 10:21