Closed Anders429 closed 3 years ago
Merging #49 (1a193b0) into 0.6.0 (e0a437e) will increase coverage by
0.80%
. The diff coverage is96.55%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 0.6.0 #49 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.63% 88.44% +0.80%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 566 571 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 496 505 +9
+ Misses 70 66 -4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/pda.rs | 84.00% <90.90%> (+2.18%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/lib.rs | 92.30% <100.00%> (+0.30%) |
:arrow_up: |
tests/integration.rs | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
word_filter_codegen/src/pda.rs | 86.06% <100.00%> (+0.23%) |
:arrow_up: |
word_filter_codegen/src/type.rs | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e0a437e...1a193b0. Read the comment docs.
This PR switches from pushing the AppendedSeparator value to the stack to using a Separator state type to identify whether computation is within a separator.
This is preferable to #47, since it doesn't require any differentiation by the user between different types of separators. Plus, this passes some edge cases that #47 doesn't.
Fixes #41 and #48.