Point-lookups on access modifiers should act similarly to control-flow constructs

[samir-memsql]

Currently, rtags-find-symbol-at-point on control-flow statements like continue, break and return direct to the enclosing control flow statement (function or loop header). This is very convenient for large functions and loops.

It would be awesome if the same behavior applied to public:, private: and protected: keywords inside classes

[Andersbakken]

Hi Samir

I'm a little confused.

Where would rtags-find-symbol-at-point take me if I used it here:

class Foo { public: void publicFunc(); protected: void protectedFunc(); private: int mMember; };

E.g. on the protected line. Where would it put the cursor?

regards

Anders

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:45 PM, samir-memsql notifications@github.com wrote:

Currently, rtags-find-symbol-at-point on control-flow statements like continue, break and return direct to the enclosing control flow statement (function or loop header). This is very convenient for large functions and loops.

It would be awesome if the same behavior applied to public:, private: and protected: keywords inside classes

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Andersbakken/rtags/issues/882, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEdSljcn6BWR_IBWmEVn1q7rBzwaENnks5rPvxkgaJpZM4LdToO .