[quick.subscript] error: terms in comma expression should be path or literal
[quick.subscript] key,?c println(s"key => $c")
[quick.subscript] ^
It is not a problem for the 'x' parameter.
Putting the parameter ?c between classic parentheses makes the error message disappear. So actual ? and ?? parameters are currently not allowed in comma expressions, but they should be.
There is another problem, popping up when ?c is between parentheses:
[quick.subscript] error: not found: value _println
[quick.subscript] key(?c) println(s"key => $c")
[quick.subscript] ^
This goes away when println(...) is put between braces, but that should not be necessary.
Input:
yielded
It is not a problem for the 'x' parameter. Putting the parameter ?c between classic parentheses makes the error message disappear. So actual ? and ?? parameters are currently not allowed in comma expressions, but they should be.
There is another problem, popping up when ?c is between parentheses:
This goes away when println(...) is put between braces, but that should not be necessary.