search

Andrewshin-7th-technology-student / build-CI

Building a CI web config. for the XXC file GO TO THE LINK TO SEE REPO RULES, ETC.
https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/blob/main/.repo%20files/README.md
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
5 stars 2 forks source link

Apply fixes from StyleCI #326

Closed Andrewshin-7th-technology-student closed 1 week ago

Andrewshin-7th-technology-student commented 1 week ago

User description

This pull request applies code style fixes from an analysis carried out by StyleCI.

For more information, click here.

PR Type

formatting

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Formatting
Node-attributes.php
Apply code style fixes to NodeAttributes class                     
testing/php/Node-attributes.php
  • Fixed a minor formatting issue by removing an extra space in a
    comment.
    		•  +1/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    cr-gpt[bot] commented 1 week ago

    Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

    code-genius-code-coverage[bot] commented 1 week ago

    The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

    sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 week ago

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This is a minor code style change that removes trailing whitespace from a PHPDoc comment in the NodeAttributes class. The change was automatically generated by StyleCI, a code style analysis tool.

    No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Removed trailing whitespace from PHPDoc comment
    • Removed whitespace at the end of @var array - algain comment line
    		 testing/php/Node-attributes.php
    Tips and commands #### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).
    semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 week ago

    Review changes with  SemanticDiff

    darkest-pr[bot] commented 1 week ago

    :imp: Send this one to journey elsewhere, for we have need of sterner stock.

    pull-checklist[bot] commented 1 week ago

    Dependabot checklist

    difflens[bot] commented 1 week ago

    View changes in DiffLens

    coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

    [!WARNING]

    Rate limit exceeded

    @codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review.

    ⌛ How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
    🚦 How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
    📥 Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 770f9f0cb75f280ed53554513c352e651e95f333 and 876daaf00cd1667017e32f34022458f84e1389f3.

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    difflens[bot] commented 1 week ago

    View changes in DiffLens

    codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] commented 1 week ago

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Documentation
    The comment contains a possible typo in the word 'algain' which might be intended to be 'again'
    difflens[bot] commented 1 week ago

    View changes in DiffLens

    gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 week ago

    Please double check the following review of the pull request:

    Issues counts

    🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
    0 0 0 0 0 1 0

    Changes in the diff

    Identified Issues

    ID Type Details Severity Confidence
    1 🤪Typo The word "algain" in the comment might be a typo. Consider revising it. 🟡Low 🟡Low

    Issue 1: Typo

    Explanation: In the file testing/php/Node-attributes.php, line 13, the comment contains the word "algain," which might be a typo. It is unclear what the intended word is, but it could be a misspelling of "again" or another term.

    Proposed Code Fix:

    /**
 * @var array - again
 */
private $attributes = [];

    Explanation of the Fix: The proposed fix assumes that "algain" was intended to be "again." This change corrects the typo, improving the clarity of the comment.

    Missing Tests

    No new functionality or logic changes were introduced in the diff, so no additional tests are necessary for this specific change. The change was purely cosmetic, addressing a readability issue by removing trailing whitespace.

    Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Your input matters! Please react or reply.

    codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] commented 1 week ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    darkest-pr[bot] commented 1 week ago

    :imp: You still foolishly consider yourself an entity separate from the whole. I know better. And I. Will. Show you.

    structuredbot[bot] commented 1 week ago

    Code Review: StyleCI Automated Fixes

    Thank you for submitting this pull request. I've reviewed the changes and the automated StyleCI fixes. Here's a detailed analysis of the modifications:

    Overview

    This PR contains a single commit applying automated fixes from StyleCI, focusing on the file testing/php/Node-attributes.php. The change removes a trailing space from a comment line:

    -     * @var array - algain 
+     * @var array - algain

    While this is a minor change, it contributes to maintaining consistent code style across the project.

    Detailed Analysis

    Naming Conventions

    Modularity

    Versioning

    Documentation and Descriptions

    Grouping and Folder Structure

    Conclusion

    While this PR addresses a minor styling issue, it highlights areas for potential improvement in the broader codebase. Consider implementing the suggested recommendations to enhance code quality, consistency, and maintainability across the project.