Update .COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md

[L1j2b3o4b5]

djfghjevkfhdoijjr4eiljhgw45lerjvoh4trlv3hqlgj3har5lgh;ov5h4reohgqhou;ueyhvo4h5f

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

• Remove detailed Microsoft terms and privacy information from the .COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md file.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Removed a section from the collaboration guidelines that detailed user privacy, content ownership, and usage policies related to Microsoft services, which may affect users' understanding of their rights and responsibilities.

[code-genius-code-coverage[bot]]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[cr-gpt[bot]]

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

[semanticdiff-com[bot]]

Review changes with  

[pull-checklist[bot]]

Dependabot checklist

• [ ] Launch LINUX web dev code file
• [ ] Check permissions from dependabot / butterb0t
• [ ] Commit changes to v1 ~~ @v1.4

[darkest-pr[bot]]

:imp: The echoes of his mindless tittering reverberate maddeningly...

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR simplifies the collaboration folder documentation by removing redundant privacy and content ownership sections while retaining essential information about content usage and sharing.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Streamline documentation by removing redundant privacy and Microsoft terms sections	Remove duplicate privacy policy information and Microsoft terms introduction Remove redundant content ownership statements Retain essential information about content usage and sharing permissions	.repo files/.COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md

---

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

[codeautopilot[bot]]

PR summary

This Pull Request modifies the .COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md file by removing a significant portion of text related to Microsoft's privacy terms and conditions. The removed text included details about privacy, content ownership, and user responsibilities. The remaining content focuses on the user's responsibility regarding content shared on Microsoft's services. The purpose of this change seems to be to streamline the document by removing redundant or unnecessary information, possibly because it is already covered elsewhere or deemed irrelevant for this specific context.

Suggestion

Consider providing a brief explanation or rationale for the removal of the detailed Microsoft terms in the Pull Request description. This would help reviewers understand the context and reasoning behind the changes, ensuring that important information is not inadvertently lost. Additionally, ensure that any necessary references to external documents or terms are maintained elsewhere if they are still relevant to the project.

_Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect._ Current plan usage: 77.66% **Have feedback or need help?** [Discord](https://discord.gg/r72ykfvyx7) [Documentation](https://docs.codeautopilot.com/) [support@codeautopilot.com](mailto:support@codeautopilot.com)

[difflens[bot]]

View changes in DiffLens

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The changes in the .COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md file involve the removal of a section detailing the terms and conditions related to Microsoft services. This section included clauses on user privacy, content ownership, usage policies, and a code of conduct. The removal results in a fragmented remaining text that lacks context and comprehensiveness, potentially affecting users' understanding of their rights and responsibilities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.repo files/.COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md	Removed a section detailing Microsoft services terms, including user rights, data handling, and conduct.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Microsoft

    User->>Microsoft: Access services
    Microsoft-->>User: Display terms and conditions
    User->>Microsoft: Agree to terms
    Microsoft-->>User: Provide access

🐇 "In the folder, changes did unfold,
Terms of service, now less told.
Rights and rules, they slipped away,
Leaving fragments in disarray.
Oh, what a hop, what a skip,
A tale of terms, now a lost trip!" 🌼

---

📜 Recent review details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2b1211d90cb17c4115d28c88750c6520d9461cd and 3f2fe423c16438640e0efe72a85c2be2a97beff7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

* `.repo files/.COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md` (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

* .repo files/.COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[difflens[bot]]

View changes in DiffLens

[guide-bot[bot]]

Thanks for opening this Pull Request! We need you to:

1. Fill out the description.

   Action: Edit description and replace <!- ... --> with actual values.

[difflens[bot]]

View changes in DiffLens

[codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot]]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Content Validation Verify that the simplified terms still accurately represent Microsoft's policies and user rights regarding content sharing and usage

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits f2b1211..3f2fe42. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Solhint	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Test coverage	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Java	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[difflens[bot]]

View changes in DiffLens

[codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot]]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Improve document structure by adding clear section headings and breaks ___ **Add a clear heading and section break before the content to improve document structure and readability.** [.repo files/.COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md [1]](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/pull/334/files#diff-53bd1381b4ec6a36a86a0332502ed48001515b8d84119c611f6c4f73c7102595R1-R1) ```diff -on the Services without compensating you. If you do not want others to have that ability, do not use the Services to share Your Content... +## Your Content Rights +When sharing content on the Services without compensating you. If you do not want others to have that ability, do not use the Services to share Your Content... + ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Adding section headings would improve document organization and readability, though the impact is moderate since the content is still understandable without them.	5
Typo	Fix numbered list formatting by removing unnecessary escape characters ___ **Fix the numbered list formatting by removing the escape character before the period in "3\."** [.repo files/.COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md [4]](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/pull/334/files#diff-53bd1381b4ec6a36a86a0332502ed48001515b8d84119c611f6c4f73c7102595R4-R4) ```diff -3\. Code of Conduct. You are accountable for your conduct and content when using the Services. +3. Code of Conduct. You are accountable for your conduct and content when using the Services. ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: Removing the escape character is a minor formatting improvement that makes the markdown more clean, but doesn't significantly impact functionality or readability.	3

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

[structuredbot[bot]]

Based on the PR summary and the in-depth analysis provided, here's a formatted review in Markdown suitable for a GitHub comment:

PR Review: Update to .COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md

Summary

This PR makes minor updates to the .COLLABORATION_FOLDER.md file in the .repo files/ directory. The changes primarily involve removing redundant or outdated information while retaining relevant terms related to content sharing and Microsoft's license to use that content.

Detailed Analysis

Documentation and Content

• Removal of significant content from the beginning of the file, including:
  • Instructions about usage of links
  • Verification of terms and conditions
  • Section titled "Microsoft terms"
  • Content related to privacy policies and user content ownership
• Retained content appears to be part of Microsoft's terms of service, specifically relating to content sharing and licensing

Modularity and Focus

• The removal of extraneous legal language improves the file's focus on actual collaboration guidelines
• Consider further breaking down the remaining content into smaller, more focused sections if appropriate

Naming Conventions and Structure

• No significant naming convention issues are apparent in the changes
• No changes were made to the folder structure or organization of models

Jinja and Macro Reusability

• These changes do not appear to impact Jinja templates or macro reusability

Recommendations

1. Verify that the removed content is indeed no longer necessary and that the remaining text provides all required information for collaborators
2. Have someone familiar with the project's legal requirements review this update to ensure compliance with necessary terms or conditions for collaboration
3. Consider further structuring the remaining content for improved readability and ease of reference

Conclusion

While this PR appears to streamline the collaboration documentation, it's crucial to ensure that all necessary legal and collaborative guidelines are maintained. The team should carefully review the changes to confirm that no essential information has been inadvertently removed.

[difflens[bot]]

View changes in DiffLens

[darkest-pr[bot]]

:imp: To fall for such a little thing... a bite of bread...