🛑 | Parent Docker Image CVE Risk (max): [Critical]

www-signal-fyi[bot] commented 1 week ago

Dockerfile Path: Dockerfile.CompressImages

Docker Image: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0-focal

Severity	Count
🛑 Critical	1
🔴 High	9
🟠 Medium	9
🟢 Low	1

Docker Image: mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4

Severity	Count
🛑 Critical	6
🔴 High	324
🟠 Medium	767
🟢 Low	21

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

Update the software bill of materials (SBOM) for the Azure Functions .NET 4 Docker image to reflect changes in library versions and references.

code-genius-code-coverage[bot] commented 1 week ago

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

cr-gpt[bot] commented 1 week ago

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 week ago

Review changes with

pull-checklist[bot] commented 1 week ago

Dependabot checklist

[ ] Launch LINUX web dev code file
[ ] Check permissions from dependabot / butterb0t
[ ] Commit changes to v1 ~~ @v1.4

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 week ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for two Docker images: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0-focal and mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4. The changes reflect updated vulnerability scans showing critical security issues in both images.

ER diagram for updated SBOM entries

erDiagram
    SBOM_ENTRY {
        string name
        string bom_ref
        string type
        string version
    }
    SBOM_ENTRY ||--|| LIBRARY : contains
    LIBRARY {
        string name
        string bom_ref
        string version
    }
    SBOM_ENTRY ||--|| TIMESTAMP : updated_at
    TIMESTAMP {
        datetime timestamp
    }

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated SBOM timestamp and component references	Updated timestamp from 2024-11-14 to 2024-11-15 Modified component reference IDs throughout the SBOM Maintained same overall structure and format of the SBOM	`provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json`
Identified critical security vulnerabilities in Docker images	Detected 1 critical vulnerability in mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0-focal Found 6 critical vulnerabilities in mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4 Documented high, medium and low severity issues for both images	`Dockerfile.CompressImages`

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

guide-bot[bot] commented 1 week ago

Thanks for opening this Pull Request! We need you to:

Fill out the description.

Action: Edit description and replace <!- ... --> with actual values.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

🚨 Prettier check failed for the following files:

[warn] provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json
[warn] provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json
[warn] Code style issues found in 2 files. Run Prettier with --write to fix.

To fix the issue, run the following command:

npx prettier --write provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json

codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] commented 1 week ago

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/commit/c12202e026777f3a2aef895850f896ea6a8456fe)

**Action:** autofix

**Failed stage:** [Run npm ci](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/actions/runs/11855185136/job/33038884804) [❌]

**Failure summary:** The action failed because the npm ci command encountered an error, resulting in an exit code 1. This
indicates that there was a problem with the npm installation process, possibly due to issues with
dependencies or configuration.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 137: npm ERR! [-w|--workspace [-w|--workspace ...]] 138: npm ERR! [-ws|--workspaces] [--include-workspace-root] [--install-links] 139: npm ERR! 140: npm ERR! aliases: clean-install, ic, install-clean, isntall-clean 141: npm ERR! 142: npm ERR! Run "npm help ci" for more info 143: npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in: 144: npm ERR! /home/runner/.npm/_logs/2024-11-15T11_09_57_734Z-debug-0.log 145: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 week ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 10961f8..c12202e. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Solhint	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Test coverage	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Java	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗