🛑 | Parent Docker Image CVE Risk (max): [Critical]

www-signal-fyi[bot] commented 1 week ago

Dockerfile Path: Dockerfile.CompressImages

Docker Image: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0-focal

Severity	Count
🛑 Critical	1
🔴 High	9
🟠 Medium	9
🟢 Low	1

Docker Image: mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4

Severity	Count
🛑 Critical	6
🔴 High	350
🟠 Medium	741
🟢 Low	21

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

Update the software bill of materials (SBOM) for the Azure Functions .NET 4 image to reflect the latest library versions.

code-genius-code-coverage[bot] commented 1 week ago

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

cr-gpt[bot] commented 1 week ago

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 week ago

Review changes with

pull-checklist[bot] commented 1 week ago

Dependabot checklist

[ ] Launch LINUX web dev code file
[ ] Check permissions from dependabot / butterb0t
[ ] Commit changes to v1 ~~ @v1.4

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 week ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for two Docker images: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0-focal and mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4. The changes reflect updated vulnerability information, showing critical security vulnerabilities in both images.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated vulnerability counts for mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0-focal image	Identified 1 Critical vulnerability Identified 9 High vulnerabilities Identified 9 Medium vulnerabilities Identified 1 Low vulnerability	`provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json`
Updated vulnerability counts for mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4 image	Identified 6 Critical vulnerabilities Identified 350 High vulnerabilities Identified 741 Medium vulnerabilities Identified 21 Low vulnerabilities	`provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json`
Updated SBOM timestamp and component references	Changed timestamp from 2024-11-15T11:09:02.798595+00:00 to 2024-11-16T11:10:24.402903+00:00 Updated multiple component reference IDs and their associated metadata	`provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json`

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 week ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 4481b04..df60d6e. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Solhint	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Test coverage	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Java	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

🚨 Prettier check failed for the following files:

[warn] provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json
[warn] provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json
[warn] Code style issues found in 2 files. Run Prettier with --write to fix.

To fix the issue, run the following command:

npx prettier --write provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json

codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] commented 1 week ago

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/commit/df60d6ec5a6f7ffb14ead4a701e8635f5463bdf8)

**Action:** Prettier Bot

**Failed stage:** [Prettier Bot](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/actions/runs/11869621151/job/33080145118) [❌]

**Failed test name:** ""

**Failure summary:** The action failed because the Prettier code style check found issues in two files:

provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json

provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json
These files do not adhere to the
expected code style. Running Prettier with the --write option can automatically fix these issues.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 115: added 1 package in 3s 116: 1 package is looking for funding 117: run `npm fund` for details 118: [command]/usr/local/bin/prettier --check provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json 119: Checking formatting... 120: [warn] provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_azure-functions_dotnet-4-sbom.json 121: [warn] provenance/mcr.microsoft.com_dotnet_sdk-6.0-focal-sbom.json 122: [warn] Code style issues found in 2 files. Run Prettier with --write to fix. 123: ##[error] 124: Prettier check failed 😢 ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

stale[bot] commented 1 week ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

darkest-pr[bot] commented 1 week ago

Andrewshin-7th-technology-student / build-CI