Andrewshin-7th-technology-student / build-CI

Building a CI web config. for the XXC file GO TO THE LINK TO SEE REPO RULES, ETC.
https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/blob/main/.repo%20files/README.md
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
3 stars 1 forks source link

Merge pull request #52 from Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/main #56

Closed Andrewshin-7th-technology-student closed 18 hours ago

Andrewshin-7th-technology-student commented 1 day ago

User description

Merge


PR Type

other


Description


Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files

πŸ’‘ PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

cr-gpt[bot] commented 1 day ago

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

structuredbot[bot] commented 1 day ago

Thanks for opening this PR!

Total commits: 1 Files changed: 0 Additions: 0 Deletions: 0

Commits: ad5fea8: Merge pull request #52 from Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/main

Merge

Changes:

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 day ago

πŸ§™ Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


Tips and commands #### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).
semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 day ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 day ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5eb251f..ad5fea8. View details on DeepSource β†—.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPythonβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource Java LogoJavaβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource C# LogoC#βœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScriptβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource Shell LogoShellβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource Kotlin LogoKotlinβœ… SuccessView Check β†—

πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
structuredbot[bot] commented 1 day ago

Modularity Analysis

The changes primarily involve CI/CD configuration updates and do not directly impact DBT model modularity. However, the new build processes and environments could support better modularization practices in the future by enabling more granular testing and deployment of individual DBT components.


Versioning Analysis

The changes do not appear to include any explicit versioning updates. Consider adding version tags or metadata to new models or significant changes to existing ones. This helps track iterations and maintain clarity between versions.


Grouping And Folder Structure Analysis

The project structure appears to follow DBT best practices with separate directories for different layers (e.g. OpenPrFunction, .github/workflows). Consider creating additional subdirectories within OpenPrFunction (e.g. models, tests) to further organize code as the project grows.


Access Control Analysis

The changes do not appear to directly impact access control measures for sensitive data in DBT models. However, it's recommended to review any data processing or exposure in the CI/CD pipeline to ensure proper access controls are maintained throughout the deployment process.


Naming Conventions Analysis

The naming conventions in the code appear to be consistent, using snake_case for variables and functions (e.g., pull_request, installation_token_provider). Model and column names are not present in the provided code, so their conventions cannot be evaluated.


Testing Coverage Analysis

The changes don't appear to include any specific DBT models or tests. However, it's important to ensure that when DBT models are added or modified, appropriate tests are included for key fields (e.g., not_null, unique) to maintain data quality.


Config Best Practices Analysis

The OpenPr.cs file includes logic for handling pull requests and configurations. Consider reviewing the materialization strategies in the DBT models referenced here. Ensure appropriate use of incremental materializations where possible to optimize performance.


Sql Performance And Efficiency Analysis

The changes don't include any SQL modifications. However, it's important to note that the CI/CD pipeline now includes steps for linting, building, and deploying to Linux servers. This could potentially impact database performance if there are any database interactions in the application.


Avoiding Anti Patterns In S Q L Analysis

The changes don't seem to include any SQL code. However, it's important to review any SQL queries in the project to avoid anti-patterns like SELECT *, unnecessary nested subqueries, or performing transformations in the wrong layer. Consider selecting only required columns and optimizing joins where applicable.


Adherence To Data Contracts Analysis

The changes appear to be focused on CI/CD workflows and don't directly impact data contracts. However, ensure that any modifications to build processes or deployments don't inadvertently alter data schemas or outputs used by other teams.


Data Lineage Tracking Analysis

The new CI/CD workflows for Linux server deployment and production don't directly impact data lineage. However, consider documenting how these automated processes affect the flow of data through your system, especially if they involve transformations or transfers between environments.


Handling Nulls And Defaults Analysis

The OpenPr.cs file should handle potential null values more robustly. Consider using null-coalescing operators or null checks for variables like 'installation', 'result', and 'settings' to prevent null reference exceptions and improve code reliability.


Jinja And Macro Reusability Analysis

The changes don't appear to include any Jinja templates or DBT macros. The modifications are mostly related to CI/CD workflows and Linux server deployment. There's no apparent opportunity for Jinja or macro reusability in this context.


Managing Data Freshness And Validity Analysis

The code changes do not directly address data freshness or validity checks for DBT models. Consider adding freshness configurations to source models, especially for time-sensitive data. Implement validity checks to ensure data accuracy and reliability in your DBT project.


Incremental Model Optimization Analysis

The changes do not appear to directly relate to incremental model optimization in DBT. However, the CI/CD pipeline updates could potentially impact how DBT models are built and deployed. Consider reviewing any DBT-specific workflows to ensure they align with best practices for incremental model processing.


Dependency Management Analysis

These changes focus on CI/CD pipeline configuration and deployment to Linux servers. No direct DBT code changes are present, so there are no dependency management aspects to comment on in this PR.


Documentation And Descriptions Analysis

The changes appear to be focused on CI/CD configuration files and do not directly impact model documentation. However, it's important to ensure that any new or modified DBT models resulting from these CI/CD changes have proper documentation and descriptions for maintainability.


Semantic Layer Consistency Analysis

The changes appear to be related to CI/CD workflows and do not directly impact the semantic layer consistency. However, it's important to ensure that any new build or deployment processes maintain the integrity of existing metric definitions and business terms across environments.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 day ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud