(Sonar) Fixed finding: "Spread syntax should be used instead of "apply()""

pixeebot[bot] commented 23 hours ago

Remediation

This change fixes "Spread syntax should be used instead of "apply()"" (id = javascript:S6666) identified by Sonar.

Details

Use the spread operator instead of the apply method. This is a more concise and readable way to pass a variable number of arguments to a function.

I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:

@pixeebot next

... and I will open a new PR right away!

🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot

Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: sonar:javascript/use-spread

Summary by Sourcery

Replace the 'apply' method with the spread operator across the codebase to comply with Sonar's recommendation for improved readability and conciseness.

Bug Fixes:

Replace the use of the 'apply' method with the spread operator to address the Sonar finding 'Spread syntax should be used instead of apply()'.

Enhancements:

Improve code readability and conciseness by using the spread operator instead of the 'apply' method.

cr-gpt[bot] commented 23 hours ago

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 23 hours ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the codebase to use the spread syntax instead of the apply() method in several JavaScript files. The changes improve code readability and follow modern JavaScript best practices.

Class diagram for updated JavaScript functions

classDiagram
    class CodeMirror {
        +version: String
        +defineMode(config, parserConfig)
    }

    class Function {
        +bind(f)
        +copyObj(obj, target, overwrite)
        +createObj(base, props)
        +removeReadOnlyRanges(doc, from, to)
        +interpretTokenStyle(style, options)
        +handleKeyBinding(cm, e)
    }

    CodeMirror : +defineMode(config, parserConfig)
    Function : +bind(f)
    Function : +removeReadOnlyRanges(doc, from, to)
    Function : +interpretTokenStyle(style, options)
    Function : +handleKeyBinding(cm, e)

    note for Function "Updated to use spread syntax instead of apply()"

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replace Function.prototype.apply() with spread syntax	Update function binding to use spread syntax Modify array manipulation to use spread syntax Refactor function calls to use spread syntax	`code/js/codemirror.js` `page/javascript.js`
Remove unnecessary semicolons and parentheses	Remove trailing semicolons from function expressions Remove unnecessary parentheses in return statements	`code/js/codemirror.js`

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 23 hours ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 2 of 2 files.

Overall, the semantic diff is 71% smaller than the GitHub diff.

	Filename	Status
:heavy_check_mark:	page/javascript.js	19.61% smaller
:heavy_check_mark:	code/js/codemirror.js	78.78% smaller

deepsource-io[bot] commented 23 hours ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits f23ad51..ad7e4af. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Java	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗
JavaScript	❌ Failure	❗ 2 occurences introduced 🎯 4 occurences resolved	View Check ↗
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Kotlin	✅ Success		View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

what-the-diff[bot] commented 23 hours ago

PR Summary

Improved Function Binding The mechanism to bind functions has been updated in both 'codemirror.js' and 'javascript.js' files. The new approach employs the spread syntax, which helps simplify the code and enhance readability.
Consistency in Statement Termination Semicolons have been added to the end of numerous statements across both files. This ensures consistency and prevents potential errors that could occur due to automatic semicolon insertion.
Updated Usage of splice Method Within the removeReadOnlyRanges function, the technique to execute the splice method has been transformed. This now leverages the spread syntax, promoting efficient code management.
Correct Punctuation in Return Statements Punctuation in various return statements has been revised by adding semicolons. This ensures that the code adheres to standard programming conventions, making it easier to decipher.
Refined Usage of the pass Function The use of the pass function in the 'javascript.js' file has been adjusted to implement the spread syntax for arguments. This results in cleaner and more manageable code.

github-actions[bot] commented 23 hours ago

🚨 Prettier check failed for the following files:

[warn] code/js/codemirror.js
[warn] page/javascript.js
[warn] Code style issues found in 2 files. Run Prettier with --write to fix.

To fix the issue, run the following command:

npx prettier --write code/js/codemirror.js page/javascript.js

codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] commented 23 hours ago

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

**Action:** Prettier Bot

**Failed stage:** [Prettier Bot](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/actions/runs/11468493347/job/31913725898) [❌]

**Failed test name:** ""

**Failure summary:** The action failed because the Prettier check found code style issues in two files:

code/js/codemirror.js

page/javascript.js
These files do not adhere to the formatting rules defined by Prettier. To fix
these issues, run Prettier with the --write option.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 115: added 1 package in 837ms 116: 1 package is looking for funding 117: run `npm fund` for details 118: [command]/usr/local/bin/prettier --check code/js/codemirror.js page/javascript.js 119: Checking formatting... 120: [warn] code/js/codemirror.js 121: [warn] page/javascript.js 122: [warn] Code style issues found in 2 files. Run Prettier with --write to fix. 123: ##[error] 124: Prettier check failed 😢 ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).