cr-gpt[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
Closed Andrewshin-7th-technology-student closed 17 hours ago
cr-gpt[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
semanticdiff-com[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Review changes with SemanticDiff.
structuredbot[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Thanks for opening this PR!
Total commits: 1 Files changed: 1 Additions: 11 Deletions: 4
Commits: 6ec7536: ci(Mergify): configuration update
Signed-off-by: null
Changes: File: .mergify.yml
Original Content:
label-alias:
bug: kind/bug
feature_request: enhancement
question: questionChanges:
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
-label-alias:
- bug: kind/bug
- feature_request: enhancement
- question: question
\ No newline at end of file
+pull_request_rules:
+ - name: Assign t-shirt size to PR
+ description: Assign a t-shirt size label to a pull request based on the number
+ of lines changed.
+ conditions:
+ - "#modified-lines >= 100"
+ - "#modified-lines < 500"
+ actions:
+ label:
+ toggle:
+ - size/L
keploynavigator[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Thanks for opening this pull request!
sourcery-ai[bot]
commented
22 hours ago This pull request updates the Mergify configuration file (.mergify.yml) to introduce a new pull request rule for automatically assigning t-shirt size labels based on the number of lines changed. The previous label alias configuration has been removed.
No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.
| Change | Details | Files |
|---|---|---|
| Removed label alias configuration |
|
.mergify.yml |
| Added new pull request rule for t-shirt size labeling |
|
.mergify.yml |
deepsource-io[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 8a9041f..6ec7536. View details on DeepSource ↗.
| Analyzer | Status | Summary | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
 Python | ✅ Success | View Check ↗ | |
 Java | ✅ Success | View Check ↗ | |
 C# | ✅ Success | View Check ↗ | |
 JavaScript | ✅ Success | View Check ↗ | |
 Shell | ✅ Success | View Check ↗ | |
 Kotlin | ✅ Success | View Check ↗ |
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪ |
| 🧪 No relevant tests |
| 🔒 No security concerns identified |
| ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Configuration Clarity The new rule for assigning t-shirt size labels only covers the "size/L" label. Consider adding rules for other sizes (XS, S, M, XL) for consistency and completeness. |
what-the-diff[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Removal of redundant label-alias section This PR removes an unused section that contains label mappings for bug, feature request, and question labels. By eliminating this, our codebase will become cleaner and easier to maintain.
Introduction of pull_request_rules section
A new section named pull_request_rules has been introduced. This section is designed to manage rules related to pull requests in an organized way.
New rule for assigning t-shirt size label
We have a new rule in place within the pull_request_rules section. This rule assigns a label size/L based on the number of lines modified in a pull request. If the number of changed lines falls between 100 and 500, the pull request gets this label. This will help categorize and manage pull requests based on their complexity and the effort needed to review and merge them.
sonarcloud[bot]
commented
22 hours ago 
Quality Gate passedIssues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
structuredbot[bot]
commented
22 hours ago While this change doesn't directly affect DBT models, it introduces automation for labeling PRs based on size. Consider creating separate rules for different size ranges (S, M, L, XL) to provide more granular categorization of changes, which could indirectly improve code review and maintainability practices.
The .mergify.yml file has been completely rewritten without any version tracking. Consider adding a version comment or metadata to track this significant change. This helps in understanding the evolution of the CI/CD configuration over time.
The changes to .mergify.yml don't directly impact DBT model organization. However, for DBT best practices, consider creating directories like 'staging/', 'marts/', and 'core/' if not already present, to group related models and improve project scalability.
The changes to .mergify.yml do not directly impact data access control. However, it's important to ensure that any automated labeling or PR processing does not inadvertently expose sensitive information in PR descriptions or comments.
The changes don't directly affect DBT naming conventions. However, consider using snake_case for the label name 'size/L' to maintain consistency with typical DBT practices. Suggestion: 'size_l' or 'size_large'.
The changes to .mergify.yml do not directly impact testing coverage. However, it's worth noting that this file modification introduces automation for PR labeling based on size, which could indirectly affect how changes are reviewed and tested. Consider adding rules to enforce testing requirements for larger PRs.
While this change to .mergify.yml doesn't directly impact DBT configurations, it's a good practice to consider implementing similar automation for DBT-specific PRs. For instance, you could add rules to label PRs that modify materialization strategies or affect large models, helping to streamline the review process for performance-critical changes.
While this change doesn't directly impact SQL performance, it's important to note that PR size can indirectly affect code quality and maintainability. Consider breaking down large PRs (500+ lines) into smaller, more manageable chunks to facilitate easier review and testing processes.
The changes in .mergify.yml do not involve SQL queries or DBT code, so there are no SQL anti-patterns to address. The modification introduces automated labeling for pull requests based on the number of lines changed, which is unrelated to SQL practices.
The changes in .mergify.yml do not directly impact data contracts or schema. However, it's worth noting that this new PR labeling system based on lines changed could indirectly affect how we track and manage changes to data models. Consider if this aligns with our current data governance practices.
While this change to .mergify.yml doesn't directly impact data lineage, it's a good practice to consider how automated PR labeling might affect the visibility and tracking of changes that could impact data lineage in the future.
The changes to .mergify.yml don't directly impact null handling or default values in DBT models. However, it's a good practice to ensure that any new or modified DBT models resulting from PRs labeled with 'size/L' have proper null handling and default values set where appropriate.
While this change doesn't directly involve SQL or DBT models, it's worth noting that the Mergify configuration could benefit from Jinja templating if similar rules are repeated for different t-shirt sizes. Consider using a Jinja macro to generate rules for various size ranges.
While this change doesn't directly impact data freshness or validity, it's worth noting that the PR size labeling could indirectly affect data quality. Large PRs (size/L) might introduce more complex changes that could potentially impact data freshness checks. Consider adding a review checklist item for data freshness configurations in large PRs.
While this change to .mergify.yml doesn't directly affect incremental model optimization, it's worth noting that PRs labeled as 'size/L' may involve significant changes. For such PRs, extra attention should be given to ensure proper incremental logic is maintained in any affected DBT models.
The changes to .mergify.yml do not directly impact DBT's dependencyManagement. However, it's worth noting that this PR introduces automated PR labeling based on size, which can indirectly help in managing the complexity of DBT project changes.
The changes to .mergify.yml introduce automation for PR labeling, but lack documentation. Consider adding comments explaining the purpose of the pull_request_rules and the rationale behind the line count thresholds for t-shirt sizing. This will help future maintainers understand and adjust the automation as needed.
The changes to .mergify.yml don't directly impact the semantic layer consistency. However, introducing automated PR labeling based on size could indirectly affect how changes to metric definitions are reviewed. Consider adding specific rules for PRs that modify metric definitions to ensure consistent review.
codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot]
commented
22 hours ago Explore these optional code suggestions:
| Category | Suggestion | Score |
| Enhancement |
Add a rule to remove the size label when conditions are no longer met___ **Consider adding a rule to remove the size label when the PR is updated and no longermeets the conditions. This ensures the label remains accurate throughout the PR lifecycle.** [.mergify.yml [1-11]](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/pull/75/files#diff-6a30e47dd51449847422017b16878889b848f6602ac56d5a2e67ce8a19afade2R1-R11) ```diff pull_request_rules: - name: Assign t-shirt size to PR - description: Assign a t-shirt size label to a pull request based on the number - of lines changed. + description: Assign a t-shirt size label to a pull request based on the number of lines changed. conditions: - "#modified-lines >= 100" - "#modified-lines < 500" actions: label: - toggle: + add: + - size/L + - name: Remove t-shirt size label + conditions: + - label=size/L + - "#modified-lines < 100 || #modified-lines >= 500" + actions: + label: + remove: - size/L ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9Why: By suggesting a rule to remove the label when conditions change, this enhancement ensures that the labeling remains accurate throughout the PR lifecycle. It addresses a potential issue of outdated labels, thus significantly improving the system's accuracy and reliability. | 9 |
Implement a more comprehensive t-shirt size labeling system for pull requests___ **Consider adding more granular t-shirt size labels for different ranges of modifiedlines. This will provide a more accurate representation of PR sizes and help in prioritizing reviews.** [.mergify.yml [2-11]](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/pull/75/files#diff-6a30e47dd51449847422017b16878889b848f6602ac56d5a2e67ce8a19afade2R2-R11) ```diff - name: Assign t-shirt size to PR - description: Assign a t-shirt size label to a pull request based on the number - of lines changed. + description: Assign a t-shirt size label to a pull request based on the number of lines changed. + conditions: + - "#modified-lines >= 1" + actions: + label: + add: + - "size/XS" +- name: Assign size/S label + conditions: + - "#modified-lines >= 10" + - "#modified-lines < 50" + actions: + label: + add: + - "size/S" +- name: Assign size/M label + conditions: + - "#modified-lines >= 50" + - "#modified-lines < 100" + actions: + label: + add: + - "size/M" +- name: Assign size/L label conditions: - "#modified-lines >= 100" - "#modified-lines < 500" actions: label: - toggle: - - size/L + add: + - "size/L" +- name: Assign size/XL label + conditions: + - "#modified-lines >= 500" + actions: + label: + add: + - "size/XL" ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7Why: This suggestion enhances the PR by providing a more detailed t-shirt size labeling system, which can help in better categorizing and prioritizing pull requests based on their size. It adds value by offering more granularity, although it is not critical for functionality. | 7 | |
| Best practice |
Use 'add' instead of 'toggle' for more consistent label application___ **Use the 'add' action instead of 'toggle' for the label. This ensures the label isalways applied when conditions are met, rather than toggling its state.** [.mergify.yml [8-11]](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/pull/75/files#diff-6a30e47dd51449847422017b16878889b848f6602ac56d5a2e67ce8a19afade2R8-R11) ```diff actions: label: - toggle: + add: - size/L ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8Why: The suggestion to use 'add' instead of 'toggle' ensures that the label is consistently applied when conditions are met, preventing any unintended toggling. This improves the reliability of the labeling system, making it a valuable best practice. | 8 |
💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat
github-actions[bot]
commented
22 hours ago 🚨 Prettier check failed for the following files:
[warn] .mergify.yml
[warn] Code style issues found in the above file. Run Prettier with --write to fix.To fix the issue, run the following command:
npx prettier --write .mergify.yml| **Action:** Prettier Bot |
| **Failed stage:** [Prettier Bot](https://github.com/Andrewshin-7th-technology-student/build-CI/actions/runs/11469198191/job/31915942035) [❌] |
| **Failed test name:** "" |
**Failure summary:**
The action failed because the Prettier formatting check detected code style issues in the .mergify.yml file. The file does not conform to the expected code style, and Prettier suggests running it with the --write option to automatically fix the issues. |
Relevant error logs:```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 113: [command]/usr/local/bin/npm install --global prettier@3.x 114: added 1 package in 746ms 115: 1 package is looking for funding 116: run `npm fund` for details 117: [command]/usr/local/bin/prettier --check .mergify.yml 118: Checking formatting... 119: [warn] .mergify.yml 120: [warn] Code style issues found in the above file. Run Prettier with --write to fix. 121: ##[error] 122: Prettier check failed 😢 ``` |
User description
This change has been made by @Andrewshin-7th-technology-student from the Mergify workflow automation editor.
PR Type
configuration changes
Description
Changes walkthrough 📝
.mergify.yml
Update Mergify configuration with new PR rules.mergify.yml
lines.