Closed isagarzazu closed 1 year ago
Here is another example:
dates= [date(2017,11,30),date(2018,1,31),date(2018,2,28),date(2018,3,31),date(2018,4,30),date(2018,5,31),date(2018,7,28),date(2018,7,31),date(2018,8,30),date(2018,8,30),date(2018,8,31),date(2018,8,31),date(2018,10,30),date(2018,10,30),date(2018,11,30),date(2018,12,31),date(2018,12,31),date(2018,12,31),date(2019,2,28),date(2019,3,31),date(2019,5,31),date(2020,1,28),date(2021,3,31),date(2021,10,30),date(2021,10,30),date(2022,2,28),date(2022,2,28),date(2022,4,30),date(2022,6,30),date(2022,10,28),date(2022,11,28),date(2022,11,28),date(2022,11,30)]
cashflow=[-1000,-1050,-1000,-650,-500,-1085,1472.5,1180,1600,7.5,1547.5,132.5,874,100.2,-1500,-1200,-500,1735,-1000,2080,-500,1900,1491.25,3300,1030,-1000,-500,1667.5,-21457.5,1808.71,1043.23,0.01,9153.25]
xirr(dates, cashflow)
xirr with a guess of 0.1 is 0.1798; in excel with the same guess is -0.6488
Hi @isagarzazu, sorry for the late response.
I've checked the data, pyxirr
returns the correct result. This can be proven using the xnpv
function. By the definition, xirr
is equals to the rate at which xnpv
= 0. If you use the result from Excel, xnpv
will not be equal to 0.
# must be close to zero
xnpv(xirr(dates, cashflow), dates, cashflow)
Excel sometimes gives the wrong result.
Basically xirr
is a solution to the minimization problem. I think Excel returns "garbage" if the algorithm does not converge. At the same time, pyxirr
has additional checks and returns None
if xnpv != 0
.
I also checked the calculation in libreoffice and it matched the result of pyxirr
.
Hi,
when I run the following example:
I get an xirr of 3.6894338683170713; the same calculation in excel gives me. a value of 0.0000003%. Seems to be an issue with the function for values very close to zero, any suggestions on how to deal with this?
thanks