Open devicelocksmith opened 2 years ago
which Stick are you using? if ODI brand, you can try ask them. we don't have RTL source code here, kind hard to patch it
I am using ODI stick. It doesn't look like there is a way to get this to work with 2.6 kernel without undoing the patch. I have ordered Lantiq stick from FS to see if that works better, if not, I'll be looking into patching kernel in memory to modify the EAPOL frame signature to something else, since I don't have kernel SDK to re-compress kernel.
i see, have you try newer firmware just in case?
Yes, I have tried that, it did not work. I've also compiled wpa_supplicant for the stick and tried sending authentication on pon0, but it did not work. The stick remains in O5 with just an omci channel open, and no VLANs set up.
Hello, can you please dump some frames of EAPOL bi-di communication including full ethernet header ? I'am a small (for now) vendor of Realtek based GPON ONTs, including SFPs. I mean, we make firmware. And the firmware for 9601C/9601D is based on most recent SDK for this chipset family that uses kernel 3.18.x.
However, EAPOL blocking is done on switch-chip level, not on kernel level. It seems to be case of initialization of default behavior that drops frames without information in L2 table (from PON port side). Last time I guess in similar way I have unlocked LLDP in case of EPON firmware, but for GPON initialization process of switch-chip is very similar.
So I guess, I can enable EAPOL in my devices.
@marcinkuczera Nice, can build firmware and fix... make sure support variety of OLT configuration including 4-port Emulation, Full Bridge, IGMP, etc...
As mentioned in other thread - emulation of 4 ports might not be easy due to conflict of untagged traffic on different physical ports. Full bridge and IGMP - works fine. Lot of ISPs in Poland use our devices.
Here is a link to eap-tls exchange
As mentioned in other thread - emulation of 4 ports might not be easy due to conflict of untagged traffic on different physical ports. Full bridge and IGMP - works fine. Lot of ISPs in Poland use our devices.
but allow to user to enable 4-port Emulation in WebGUI or Command-Line, disable by default.
it would be nice allow user to custom VLAN Mapping from PON Interface
@marcinkuczera Not sure if that is what you are looking for, but it looks like RMA is already set to forward the correct multicast LSB
RTK.0> rma dump
RMA 01-80-C2-00-00-xx
trail action
00 Forward 01 Drop 02 Drop
03 Forward 04 Forward 05 Forward
06 Forward 07 Forward 08 Forward
09 Forward 0a Forward 0b Forward
0c Forward 0d Forward 0e Forward
0f Forward 10 Forward 11 Forward
12 Forward 13 Forward 14 Forward
15 Forward 16 Forward 17 Forward
18 Forward 19 Forward 1a Forward
1b Forward 1c Forward 1d Forward
1e Forward 1f Forward 20 Forward
21 Forward 22 Forward 23 Forward
24 Forward 25 Forward 26 Forward
27 Forward 28 Forward 29 Forward
2a Forward 2b Forward 2c Forward
2d Forward 2e Forward 2f Forward
The correct LSB is 03 and it is already set to forward
by default.
Could it be filtering by ethertype? I am not finding how to check or set that. The correct ethertype for EAPoL is 0x888e
yes, ethertype is most probably used for filtering..
@devicelocksmith can you share your wpa_supplicant binary here?
It seems like RTL960x 2.6.30 kernel is filtering EAPOL frames due to this kernel patch:
[Bridge] [RFC] bridging: don't forward EAPOL frames
My ISP requires 802.1x authentication. ISP-provided ONT is using a newer kernel withecho 8 > /sys/class/net/brXXX/bridge/group_fwd_mask
workaround, however it is not available on older kernel. Has anyone found a way to pass such frames on this chipset?