Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
> Since 1.2 it seems development is off site somewhere else.
Correct.
What is your issue?
Original comment by chris...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2013 at 8:08
No issue. Just wondered why you changed this and whether the development can
still be followed somewhere.
Original comment by dominik....@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2013 at 8:45
I changed it because no one else was contributing, I’ve pulled in a lot of my
own (private) code & 3rd party libs, and it’s a lot easier to work locally (&
privately).
SvnX 2.0 is a major rewrite and already has over 1,500 commits & around 70,000
lines of original code.
[I.e. Significantly larger & more complex than when I first took over
development.]
Also most of the features since svnX 1.2 (& before) were back ported from the
2.0 development branch. Which is made easier by having them both in the same,
offline, repo.
FYI the best/preferred place for svnX questions & discussions is
<http://groups.google.com/group/svnx> .
Original comment by chris...@gmail.com
on 20 Jun 2013 at 1:47
Thanks, I understand the "no one else was contributing" but don't quite
understand that it's a lot easier to work locally unless you don't keep it
under version control :)
Anyway, looking forward to the new version :)
Original comment by dominik....@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2013 at 9:08
I would also like to have the source code of 1.3.4 in the public repository.
Otherwise this is not open source any more.
Original comment by arkhipov...@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2014 at 12:29
Original comment by chris...@gmail.com
on 24 Aug 2015 at 7:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dominik....@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2013 at 11:20