William Lee individual review ticket

[wl0503]

1. Video: William Lee Individual Video In the video, I addressed my contribution and how they work in both visually(on webpage) and codingly(in vscode).

2. Analytics(profile): Analytics and contribution Analysts page is the place to show my contribution to the project. Overall, I contributed to the visual elements of our project, the binary calculator. I activated the animation effect on the reset button so that users can experience it whenever they refresh the page. I also made the RGB color surrounding effect near the button corresponding the theme for our project, which is RGB. In addition, I created the toggle button that gives the color change of black and white background in the binary number inputs. Lastly, I added the reset button that can delete the binary number inputs without clicking delete one by one.

3. Individual ticket(Key commits): Binary project ideations and plans Visual update to Binary Calculator Deletion of changes that cause errors Binary calculator with additional effect Final ver binary calculator

Grading rubric: Individual Review "My name" grading "Their name"

• [ ] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [ ] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [ ] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [ ] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions

• [ ] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

  Freeform comment.
  Provide positivies and growth summary.
  Justify or comment on final score.
  Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.

[daniel-s-lee]

Individual Review "Daniel Lee" grading "William "

• [Yes ] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [Yes ] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [Yes ] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [Yes ] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions

• [Yes ] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

  Freeform comment.
  William got a 0.89 because he made major contributions to his team's project by changing he visual components of his project and he fixed major issues that his team was experiencing. He met all of the conditions and went beyond with his innovative frontend design.