Open diertani opened 10 years ago
@beatrice57 and I talked about this, and she agreed to think about whether we need two indices in this case, or whether it is possible to treat all three as links on the same chain. (The latter is my not-very-considered opinion.) Since this might require an update to the annotation manual, maybe she can comment.
If we did the latter, we'd have to revise all the extant corpora, correct?
Eventually we might want to, but it's not clear it would be immediately necessary. Another way of putting it is, it's crucial that, (in CS terminology) *T* sameindex which
and *T* sameindex *
. Is it ever important whether or not which sameindex *
? The old way does not have this relationship; the new way does. But if it's really not important, then it can be encoded in either way, without affecting anything.
See also #37.
I need the subject of the matrix here to have two indexes: one on the trace, co-indexed with the wh-operator, and another on the syntactic tag, co-indexed with the null subject of the small clause. There is currently no way in annotald to do this.