Closed tta7592 closed 4 years ago
Thanks for pointing this out.
No they should not be equal. I corrected the code, see the .Rmd file of this commit: https://github.com/AntoineSoetewey/statsandr/commit/88ffeaa90c901b715c63171a8d68b087ae4853d2.
Let me know if this helps. Best, Antoine
Thanks a lot!
One more question, if I may
At the moment I have "cumulative_incident_cases" for the observed period. But for the predicted period I have NAs for "cumulative_incident_cases" both in the table fir and in the table fitted_cummulative_incidence. Could you, please help. How to get "cumulative_incident_cases" for the predicted period.
Thank you
fit
and the table fitted_cummulative_incidence
are the same, so it's normal you have the same results.cumulative_incident_cases
are the observed cases, so it's normal that we have NAs for the predicted period.I
in the fit table gives you the number of infected people predicted by the model.Does that help you?
Dear Antoine,
thank you very much for you paper on the top resources for covid 19 analytics.
I tried to adjust your code for Belgium for Ukraine. It looks easy - thanks for this. But as I could see - column "cumulative_incident_cases" in my table "fit" is the same as the colum "I"
Should they be equal?