empty: add integers conversion

[ccoVeille]

This pattern should be detected

assert.Equal(t, 0, int(ret.ExitCode))
assert.Equal(t, 0, int(ret.GasUsed))

Example: https://github.com/ipfs-force-community/go-fvm-sdk/blob/d49236897af1fdb5e0f7d29573fcbe1d29e2214d/sdk/cases/send.go#L40-L41

The following code should be suggested

assert.Empty(t, ret.ExitCode)
assert.Empty(t, ret.GasUsed)

This pattern is currently not detected, while it's pretty commonly used https://github.com/search?q=language%3Ago+%22assert.Equal%28t%2C+0%2C+int%22&type=code

[Antonboom]

Please, do not use Empty for objects for which len is not applicable. For me these are Zero cases and use Empty is not best and doubtful option here.

[ccoVeille]

That's right. As you declined the idea of a zero checker, I assumed you didn't want to suggest using zero.

BTW, I just found out these cannot be part of empty checker, as nothing detects this now

a := 17
assert.Equal(t, 0, a)

So I'm unsure where to add it

[ccoVeille]

here are some other use cases

https://github.com/search?q=%22assert.Equal%28t%2C+int%280%29%2C%22+NOT+is%3Aarchived+NOT+is%3Afork+language%3Ago&type=code

https://github.com/karim7262/datadog-agent/blob/a48b9b58fb9f13e53782a936783da2cc4b7b0c7c/pkg/autodiscovery/providers/zookeeper_test.go#L206

assert.Equal(t, int(0), zkr.cache.NumAdTemplates)

[Antonboom]

As you declined the idea of a zero checker, I assumed you didn't want to suggest using zero.

Yes, we are in a stalemate – I have nothing against zero that concentrated on zero objects only, how I mentioned before – https://github.com/Antonboom/testifylint/issues/75#issuecomment-2067582114. But I do not want introduce any complex matrix solutions spread across checkecks

So, let's just ignore assert.Equal(t, 0, a) and similar