Open Antonboom opened 1 week ago
(cc) @ccoVeille @mmorel-35
OK, noted.
I'm sorry if my remarks leads to noise and distraction.
I was focused on empty because it was making sense for me, and my codebase.
Also, I was looking at these kind of issues because it's easier to contribute by updating/changing an existing linter than creating a new one.
But, I now understand better what you expect. It's a good thing to have a clear roadmap.
One thing that also leads me to create issue is because it's the only way for me to communicate with you.
I think it would be better if we could have another way to discuss and talk about things.
Here are the option I'm thinking about:
What do you think about it?
enable discussions on project
I thought about it too. Done 👌
Hi @ccoVeille , Please send me an invite to join https://gophers.slack.com/ I'm not a member yet.
It said unable to send invite. I will have to check, and maybe contact the admin of this community
@mmorel-35 please try this
https://join.slack.com/t/gophers/shared_invite/zt-2lmem2ic2-EfbtKK9FGlBHHgeEu0an7Q
The link is valid a month
Hi, everyone!
I appreciate your contribution to
testifylint
, but at the moment the project has not yet entered the stabilization phase, but is maintaining a strategy for unrealized functionality.Thus, we should concentrate on the implementation of new checkers, and not on multi-day discussions about whether
Empty
is suitable for typed zero or not (relatively speaking).After the minor release, we can waste some time (e.g. not more than two) to other issues (related to old checkers). And to begin to focus on the next milestone: https://github.com/Antonboom/testifylint/milestones
Checkers can be implemented in any order, the milestones above are my vision of priorities. If some checkers implementation are awaiting my feedback, that feel free to ping me.
Thank you!