Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.
โฑ๏ธ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, involving the removal of a single analyzer configuration. |
๐งช Relevant tests | No |
โก Possible issues | No |
๐ Security concerns | No |
Category | Suggestion | Score |
Possible issue |
Review the impact of removing the test coverage analyzer on quality assurance___ **Consider reviewing the implications of removing the test coverage analyzer, as it mayaffect the overall quality assurance process and the ability to track code coverage metrics.** [.deepsource.toml [4]](https://github.com/ApiBR/vagas-aggregator-ui/pull/261/files#diff-a8c050b1fb601cdd8ba1282e837bc0b553d4f83de74d151e52f415b4e1ed6d14R4-R4) ```diff -[[analyzers]] -name = "test-coverage" +# Analyzer removed; ensure coverage metrics are tracked elsewhere ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7Why: The suggestion highlights a valid concern regarding the removal of the test coverage analyzer, which could impact quality assurance, but it does not propose a specific solution or alternative. | 7 |
Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!
Scan results:
12:15AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:15AM INF 393 commits scanned.
12:15AM INF scan completed in 974ms
12:15AM INF no leaks found
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
Description
test-coverage
analyzer.Changes walkthrough ๐
.deepsource.toml
Update DeepSource configuration by removing test coverage
.deepsource.toml
test-coverage
analyzer configuration.secrets
analyzer configuration.