ApiBR / vagas-aggregator-ui

๐Ÿ“๐Ÿข Vagas Aggregator UI
https://apibr.com/ui/vagas
MIT License
7 stars 1 forks source link

Update DeepSource configuration by removing test coverage analyzer #261

Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago

guibranco commented 2 months ago

Description


Changes walkthrough ๐Ÿ“

Relevant files
Configuration changes
.deepsource.toml
Update DeepSource configuration by removing test coverage

.deepsource.toml
  • Removed the test-coverage analyzer configuration.
  • Retained the secrets analyzer configuration.
  • +0/-3     
    code-genius-code-coverage[bot] commented 2 months ago

    The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    PR Review ๐Ÿ”

    โฑ๏ธ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, involving the removal of a single analyzer configuration.
    ๐Ÿงช Relevant tests No
    โšก Possible issues No
    ๐Ÿ”’ Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    PR Code Suggestions โœจ

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Review the impact of removing the test coverage analyzer on quality assurance ___ **Consider reviewing the implications of removing the test coverage analyzer, as it may
    affect the overall quality assurance process and the ability to track code coverage
    metrics.** [.deepsource.toml [4]](https://github.com/ApiBR/vagas-aggregator-ui/pull/261/files#diff-a8c050b1fb601cdd8ba1282e837bc0b553d4f83de74d151e52f415b4e1ed6d14R4-R4) ```diff -[[analyzers]] -name = "test-coverage" +# Analyzer removed; ensure coverage metrics are tracked elsewhere ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion highlights a valid concern regarding the removal of the test coverage analyzer, which could impact quality assurance, but it does not propose a specific solution or alternative.
    7
    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    12:15AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    12:15AM INF 393 commits scanned.
    12:15AM INF scan completed in 974ms
    12:15AM INF no leaks found
    
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud