Closed nix-apollo closed 1 month ago
Discussed the motivation with Nix and said
Also Nix made a good unrelated argument
So we tentatively concluded we probably do not want to ignore the 0th position anymore, but if someone wants to finish the PR and implement the changed ablations that's also fine. Both are sensible RIB choices.
We decided to not implement this feature
Ignore the 0th sequence position
Description
This isn't well tested or carefully handled with asserts, but I'm using it for experiments.
Related Issue
313
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
I added a single test to make sure it runs. I'll run and examine outputs.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No