Open dryusername opened 8 months ago
Related to https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/5631. I'm not sure if we can build the ARM64 package on Ubuntu using an x86_64 system.
Related to actions/runner-images#5631. I'm not sure if we can build the ARM64 package on Ubuntu using an x86_64 system.
according to the post, it's possible to use a custom runner
@arpanbag001 You could use an AWS Graviton instance as your own self-hosted runner for GitHub Actions, or you could use BuildJet. This has become a non-issue for me since I started using it. You only need to change one line in your action file. I've made dozens of builds and it hasn't even cost me anything yet.
Related to actions/runner-images#5631. I'm not sure if we can build the ARM64 package on Ubuntu using an x86_64 system.
according to the post, it's possible to use a custom runner
@arpanbag001 You could use an AWS Graviton instance as your own self-hosted runner for GitHub Actions, or you could use BuildJet. This has become a non-issue for me since I started using it. You only need to change one line in your action file. I've made dozens of builds and it hasn't even cost me anything yet. https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions
So does this mean that it's possible to build it for ARM?
Or one could use the docker/qemu-action and build AppFlowy as part of a container build. But that's likely a hacky solution. QEMU would allow building ARM64 on x86_64 hardware. One would just need a custom runner for it, as it's probably not possible to setup a QEMU machine inside of a GitHub Action :sweat_smile: For AppImage the Open Build Service would also provide a solution to build it. But its not integrated into a GitHub CI/CD.
Description
I'd like to run the software on Ubuntu for ARM64, but the current snap/image doesn't have a stable ARM64 release, which prohibits the terminal from installing the package.
Impact
It very quickly becomes very hard to use a software when this type of limitation shows up.
Additional Context
No response