Package Name Scope Recommendation

[lsw1164]

Unity recommends the following naming convention for package names: com.{companyname}.{name}. Reference: Unity Manual: Package naming.

Currently, each package provided by Appsflyer has a separate scope, which complicates management, especially when adding new packages, as a new scope needs to be added each time.

Recommendation: To streamline the process and enhance manageability, I recommend the following package names:

• For the core Unity plugin: appsflyer-unity-plugin -> com.appsflyer.core

• For the ad revenue generic connector: appsflyer-unity-adrevenue-generic-connector -> com.appsflyer.adrevenue-generic-connector

This approach allows all packages under the com.appsflyer scope to be easily identified as provided by Appsflyer.

Benefits: Simplified package management Consistent naming convention in line with Unity recommendations Easier identification of Appsflyer packages within the com.appsflyer scope

Thanks.

[af-vero]

Hi @lsw1164, Thanks for your comment, noted