Open AprupKale opened 11 months ago
Thanks for bringing this up! We have indeed noticed this issue too and as such, mentioned it in the Known Issues of UG and Planned Enhancements of DG as shown in the pictures below.
Known Issues of UG
Appendix: Planned Enhancements of DG
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: I believe that the response should be response.NotInScope
as the UG mentions that you plan on enhancing our Birthday class by manually adding checks in isValidBirthday to detect invalid dates
, and according to the bug triaging guidelines, it is considered NotInScope
but cannot be Rejected
and can be considered a type.FeatureFlaw
instead of my original type.FunctionalityBug
(see below)
App lets me input invalid birthdays without displaying an error message or a warning.
An apt error message should be displayed should the user try to enter invalid birthdays instead of accepting them.