Closed AquaAuma closed 8 months ago
I had to modify the survey summary to plot num
and wgt
instead of num_cpue
or num_cpua
and wgt_cpue
or wgt_cpua
, and remembered there was a choice not to transform into cpue/cpua because they are constant variables in the survey
Hello!
Although this is closed, I found complete zeros in the clean+compiled files with flags from the NEUS survey in wgt/num CPUE and CPUA columns:
As you can see below, the raw numbers and wgts are intact. I can generate new columns with raw values but is there a further issue with the QA/QC?
Thank you!
it's because we don't have precise data for this survey of haul duration or swept area, making the cpua/cpue variables not that interesting. I guess it could be replaced with NAs rather than 0. See here: https://github.com/AquaAuma/FishGlob_data/tree/main/metadata_docs#northeast-us---neus
I guess NA does make more sense than 0, since it would more clearly be "not available" rather than a true zero.
Thank you! More scrupulous reading on my part would have done the trick.
I agree that NAs would make more sense!
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 4:32 AM Liam MacNeil @.***> wrote:
Thank you! More scrupulous reading on my part would have done the trick.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/AquaAuma/FishGlob_data/issues/37#issuecomment-1851948710, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHQNR7UNDAA67XZXQN5KR73YJBFGJAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7N6VSGGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNJRHE2DQNZRGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Zoë Kitchel 207-807-4426
I am getting this in the clean NEUS survey data
which does not seem normal? I don't remember whether we had the possibility to transform abundance/weights in cpue/cpua for NEUS?
Ideas @zoekitchel @mpinsky