AquaSat / AquaMatch_harmonize_WQP

https://aquasat.github.io/AquaMatch_harmonize_WQP/
MIT License
1 stars 3 forks source link

Consider moving the map in p3_chla/doc_harmonized_site_info #87

Closed mbrousil closed 6 months ago

mbrousil commented 6 months ago

Question: Is there a performance reason to do the map within the function instead of as an argument in the target?

Context for the question/alternate approach to think about: If branches are used in the target argument, we could maybe get any failed site info pulls on a re-run, such that you don't need the result/error step here. It feels a little more "aligned" with the rest of the workflow that uses branches quite frequently.

_Originally posted by @steeleb in https://github.com/rossyndicate/AquaMatch_harmonize_WQP/pull/86#discussion_r1557902890_

See if map() will work in the tar_target() part of this

mbrousil commented 6 months ago

fuggedaboutit