sylvainkahane
commented
1 year ago It would be nice to be able to extract different lexicons from a treebank. We worked with a master student on that a few years ago. But maybe it is a bit too complicated to propose to extract all subcategorization frames, especially because we need to select a list of relations we want to consider and also because we need for some relations to go to a depth 2 (in "talk to N" vs "want to Vinf", we want to know what is the POS of the dependent of the adposition "to"). http://www.tal.univ-paris3.fr/plurital/memoires/song_yuchen-RD-1920.pdf
I think it could be interesting to be able to add the dependency relation in the lexicon features clustering choices.
@bguil any technical reason it would not be possible ?
Or maybe it's redundant with the table ? I don't think it's 100% redundant with the table