Closed dustymc closed 2 years ago
As most of our specimens are marine, it is tempting to want to include more bays, straits, gulfs and other bodies of water in Higher Geography. For us, these smaller bodies of water are similar to county divisions. But we can certainly live with the expanded list of Seas and limit smaller bodies of water to Localities.
Does this need comment? You added some seas at our request so, for use, we can close this issue unless there are loose ends to tie up.
It's still random data so I think this should stay open somewhere -perhaps moved to documentation or deprioritized.
I don't know what to document - I think seas are still a problem. Moving back to main repo for code table cleanup label.
Tabling - we don't seem to be interested, https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/3272 would allow Arctos to standardize geography.
SABI Goal Redo indexing of DarwinCore field ‘Higher Geography’ and Features in Arctos PostgreSQL. Currently, data entry is manual, not by geocoordinates; thus, key functions are broken.
Our definition of "sea" is lacking. http://handbook.arctosdb.org/documentation/higher-geography.html#seas
Suggestion: Limit seas to things in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_seas
Current data; BOLD are not in the wiki list. Links to geography and specimens below.
Gulf of Chiriquí