Closed Jegelewicz closed 2 years ago
Added ctcount_units
This should be caching properly, and filtering out to things that use the cache, now.
Weird data - eg, multiple determinations - will break the cache, so there's a status on /guid/ pages in next release.
The cache is just pulling the attribute values, so using anything other than 'individuals' for units, or any non-integer value with any units, will also do something interestingly fatal.
There is no default; not providing this attribute will result in individualcount=NULL being send out with DWC.
I can help bulkload initial data if necessary, just let me know how to calculate this.
@sharpphyl your collection had nothing, if you'll let me know how to get the initial values I can magic them in.
For collection_cde=Ento collections, the old code was using max(lot_count)
@mlbowser @leet1984 @campmlc @dssikes @mvzhuang @wellerjes @terrymcglynn @lin-fred @Jegelewicz @droberts49 @jrpletch @lmtabak
For collection_cde=Fish collections, the old code was using
sum(lot_count)
where
part_name like '%whole%' and
coll_obj_disposition not in ('discarded','used up','deaccessioned','missing','transfer of custody')
@ebraker @byuherpetology @leet1984 @mkoo @ewommack @campmlc @ccicero @mvzhuang @wellerjes @lin-fred @Jegelewicz @gradyjt @jandreslopez @droberts49 @zmsch @jrpletch @lmtabak
@sharpphyl your collection had nothing, if you'll let me know how to get the initial values I can magic them in.
The number of individuals in a catalog record for DMNS:Inv is in the field Qty under Parts.
If a record has both a shell and an operculum, each part will appear separately but the number of individuals doesn't increase.
Thanks for magicing them in.
Is this where we add the individual count attribute during data entry?
I think we still add the count in the Qty field too so it shows as a "shell" or other part. Does that mess up anything?
@sharpphyl I think that means you want sum(lot_count) - 1 in your first screenshot, 2 in the second?
You should definitely continue to provide lot count - it's a completely different thing (and much more important, in my view).
Yep that's one place to edit Attributes.
@Jegelewicz the frontmatter on the parts doc page seems to be mangled and it's claiming you edited - fix?
Thanks all for updating this. We don't have a good inventory yet of our specimens, it's all legacy numbers at the moment. I will keep this in mind for when we do an inventory!
@sharpphyl some data for your review:
create table temp_dmnsinvic as select
guid,
'individual count' as attribute,
sum(lot_count)::text as attribute_value,
'individuals' as attribute_units,
'Phyllis Sharp' as determiner
from
flat
inner join specimen_part on flat.collection_object_id=specimen_part.derived_from_cat_item
inner join coll_object on specimen_part.collection_object_id=coll_object.collection_object_id
where
flat.guid_prefix='DMNS:Inv'
group by
guid
;
Let me know if it is as expected.
@sharpphyl I think that means you want sum(lot_count) - 1 in your first screenshot, 2 in the second?
No, both of these records have only one organism. The first has only the shell and the second has both the shell and its operculum. There may be a few records where these aren't the same Qty, but I can adjust them manually. So if they are the same, that's the number of individuals in the record.
I looked at your csv and found specimens (e.g. https://arctos.database.museum/guid/DMNS:Inv:25570) that show 2 organisms where there is only one. Perhaps we should only count the number of shells if there is both a shell and an operculum and they have the same Qty. If they are different, we would use the larger quantity as the number or organisms.
I checked a few records where the part name is exoskeleton, test or whole organism and I didn't find any issues.
@sharpphyl I can't quite figure out how to interpret that.
Maybe just max (rather than sum) lotcount works for a first pass? That seems to work for the few examples so far.
Or below are your unique part name combos - maybe we can set this up as
when partaggregate='shell|whole organism' then do_some_thing when partaggregate='operculum|shell|whole organism' then do_something_else when.....
??
Note that these are determinations, you can adjust them as necessary, and both bulk loaders and unloaders are available.
p
--------------------------------
shell|whole organism
shell
test
operculum|shell|shell
shell|shell
test|whole organism
whole organism
shell|test
operculum|shell|whole organism
operculum|shell
egg
exoskeleton|shell
egg case|operculum|shell
operculum
egg case|shell
exoskeleton
egg case
(17 rows)
the frontmatter on the parts doc page seems to be mangled and it's claiming you edited - fix?
Give me a pointer so I can figure out where to go look?
There's no sidenav thingee
No sidenav thingee where?
Let's see if this helps.
Rule 1 - if there is only one part, use the value in Part Qty Rule 2 - if there is a shell and an operculum, use the value in Part Qty for shell only. Do not add the operculum Qty. Rule 3 - sum certain part Qty values as listed below
shell - use Qty test - use Qty exoskeleton - use Qty egg case - use Qty egg - I changed this to egg case whole organism - use Qty operculum - use Qty
operculum|shell - use the shell Qty only operculum|shell|shell - sum the shell Qtys only operculum|shell|whole organism - sum the shell and whole organism Qtys only
egg case|operculum|shell - use the shell Qty only - I only found one record for this - https://arctos.database.museum/guid/DMNS:Inv:22493 Are there others?
shell|whole organism - sum the Qtys shell|shell - sum the Qtys test|whole organism - sum the Qtys shell|test - sum the Qtys exoskeleton|shell - sum the Qtys egg case|shell - sum the Qtys
Apologies for not being able to follow this more closely and coming in with a stupid question, but I thought that individual count could be a field to use to record all the individuals in a lot, regardless of number of parts? And ideally could be used for other taxa, eg fish, tadpoles, parasites?
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022, 8:51 AM Phyllis Sharp @.***> wrote:
- [EXTERNAL]*
Let's see if this helps.
Rule 1 - if there is only one part, use the value in Part Qty Rule 2 - if there is a shell and an operculum, use the value in Part Qty for "shell" as the default. Do not add the operculum Qty. Rule 3 - sum certain part Qty values as listed below
shell - use Qty test - use Qty exoskeleton - use Qty egg case - use Qty egg - I changed this to egg case whole organism - use Qty operculum - use Qty
operculum|shell - use the shell Qty only operculum|shell|shell - sum the shell Qtys only operculum|shell|whole organism - sum the shell and whole organism Qtys only egg case|operculum|shell - sum the egg case and shell Qtys only
shell|whole organism - sum the Qtys shell|shell - sum the Qtys test|whole organism - sum the Qtys shell|test - sum the Qtys exoskeleton|shell - sum the Qtys egg case|shell - sum the Qtys
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/4032#issuecomment-1046047162, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADQ7JBGBX3LIN5L6QRDHD6LU364A3ANCNFSM5GQXX5GQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@sharpphyl how's this?
I corrected the organism count on five odd records that didn't fit my "rules." Highlighted in yellow. I also added 10 records at the very bottom uploaded since you ran this report. If it looks ok to you, let's do it.
temp_dmnsinvic-2 - PMS edits.csv
Thanks for making magic.
I thought that individual count could be a field to use to record all the individuals in a lot, regardless of number of parts? And ideally could be used for other taxa, eg fish, tadpoles, parasites?
That's exactly what it is.
HI Teresa,
Attached is the mammal catalog. I am sending it to you because of the misnaming of ACUNHC 1.
All the best Tom
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:46 AM Teresa Mayfield-Meyer < @.***> wrote:
I thought that individual count could be a field to use to record all the individuals in a lot, regardless of number of parts? And ideally could be used for other taxa, eg fish, tadpoles, parasites?
That's exactly what it is.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/4032#issuecomment-1047065523, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVRLPTBB2OWDUNXL5PBEDLDU4JT5HANCNFSM5GQXX5GQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Goal Accurately describe the number of individuals that participated in an occurrence per dwc:individualCount in order to pass appropriate information to aggregators.
Context https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/3908#issuecomment-949698521
Table https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctattribute_type
Value individual count
Definition The number of individuals represented by this catalog record.
Attribute data type number+units
Attribute value integers
Attribute units individuals
Priority [ Please choose a priority-label to the right. ]