ArctosDB / arctos

Arctos is a museum collections management system
https://arctos.database.museum
60 stars 13 forks source link

Code Table Request - DZTM: Denver Zoology Tissue Mammal #5905

Open Jegelewicz opened 1 year ago

Jegelewicz commented 1 year ago

Instructions

This is a template to facilitate communication with the Arctos Code Table Committee. Submit a separate request for each relevant value. This form is appropriate for exploring how data may best be stored, for adding vocabulary, or for updating existing definitions.

Reviewing documentation before proceeding will result in a more enjoyable experience.


Initial Request

Goal: Describe what you're trying to accomplish. This is the only necessary step to start this process. The Committee is available to assist with all other steps. Please clearly indicate any uncertainty or desired guidance if you proceed beyond this step.

All DZTM: Denver Zoology Tissue Mammal should be replaced with other ID type = other identifier and issued by agent Denver Museum of Nature and Science Mammal Tissue Collection

Proposed Value: Proposed new value. This should be clear and compatible with similar values in the relevant table and across Arctos.

Proposed Definition: Clear, complete, non-collection-type-specific functional definition of the value. Avoid discipline-specific terminology if possible, include parenthetically if unavoidable.

Context: Describe why this new value is necessary and existing values are not.

Table: Code Tables are http://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm. Link to the specific table or value. This may involve multiple tables and will control datatype for Attributes. OtherID requests require BaseURL (and example) or explanation. Please ask for assistance if unsure.

Collection type: Some code tables contain collection-type-specific values. collection_cde may be found from https://arctos.database.museum/home.cfm

Priority: Please describe the urgency and/or choose a priority-label to the right. You should expect a response within two working days, and may utilize Arctos Contacts if you feel response is lacking.

Available for Public View: Most data are by default publicly available. Describe any necessary access restrictions.

Project: Add the issue to the Code Table Management Project.

Discussion: Please reach out to anyone who might be affected by this change. Leave a comment or add this to the Committee agenda if you believe more focused conversation is necessary.

Approval

All of the following must be checked before this may proceed.

The How-To Document should be followed. Pay particular attention to terminology (with emphasis on consistency) and documentation (with emphasis on functionality).

Rejection

If you believe this request should not proceed, explain why here. Suggest any changes that would make the change acceptable, alternate (usually existing) paths to the same goals, etc.

  1. Can a suitable solution be found here? If not, proceed to (2)
  2. Can a suitable solution be found by Code Table Committee discussion? If not, proceed to (3)
  3. Take the discussion to a monthly Arctos Working Group meeting for final resolution.

Implementation

Once all of the Approval Checklist is appropriately checked and there are no Rejection comments, or in special circumstances by decree of the Arctos Working Group, the change may be made.

Review everything one last time. Ensure the How-To has been followed. Ensure all checks have been made by appropriate personnel.

Make changes as described above. Ensure the URL of this Issue is included in the definition.

Close this Issue.

DO NOT modify Arctos Authorities in any way before all points in this Issue have been fully addressed; data loss may result.

Special Exemptions

In very specific cases and by prior approval of The Committee, the approval process may be skipped, and implementation requirements may be slightly altered. Please note here if you are proceeding under one of these use cases.

  1. Adding an existing term to additional collection types may proceed immediately and without discussion, but doing so may also subject users to future cleanup efforts. If time allows, please review the term and definition as part of this step.
  2. The Committee may grant special access on particular tables to particular users. This should be exercised with great caution only after several smooth test cases, and generally limited to "taxonomy-like" data such as International Commission on Stratigraphy terminology.
campmlc commented 1 year ago

These involve MSB and DMNS records linked by same individual as relationships. The mammal voucher is at MSB, and the tissues are at DMNS, vice versa, or tissues were shared between institutions. The DZTM: Denver Zoology Tissue Mammal identifier is an explicit ID that needs to be distinct from just other ID issued by DMNS in order to link the tissues at DMNS to MSB vouchers and tissues. Please hold off of doing anything with the MSB records until this can be reviewed, discussed and updated by MSB personnel. @jldunnum @AdrienneRaniszewski

campmlc commented 1 year ago

How did this get closed in 24 hrs, before collection approval? This needs to be reviewed.

Jegelewicz commented 1 year ago

It is a duplicate.

campmlc commented 1 year ago

I followed the link in the google sheet.

Jegelewicz commented 1 year ago

Removed and tried to find the others too.

campmlc commented 1 year ago

Ok, let me know when mammal one is posted so I can add the comment, thanks.

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:29 PM Teresa Mayfield-Meyer < @.***> wrote:

  • [EXTERNAL]*

Removed and tried to find the others too.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/5905#issuecomment-1469050107, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADQ7JBGYLNRHN35C2O3TG4TW4EEO3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAVZUD6EQ . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>

Jegelewicz commented 4 months ago

Not a duplicate still needs cleanup.

Jegelewicz commented 4 months ago

Today I reviewed all MSB records that included a DTZM identifier. Many of them also included an Arctos record GUID link to a DMNS:Mamm record, but some did not. I loaded 132 links from MSB records (Mamm and Para) to DMNS:Mamm records based upon DZTM numbers. So now, all "relationships" using DZTM numbers should be explicit to DMNS:Mamm records on the MSB side.

@jldunnum @msbparasites I suggest that the workflow for cataloging these shared individuals and host/parasites include a step to look up the DMNS:Mamm record and add the appropriate link with an Arctos record GUID identifier.

@acdoll I don't think any of the links to MSB:Mamm or MSB:Para exist in the DMNS:Mamm collection. I suggest turning on the reciprocal relationship bot to get them added for you. See https://handbook.arctosdb.org/documentation/bot.html

As the change to issued by will be made in both collections, it should have no affect on finding missing Arctos record GUID identifiers should that be a problem in the future.

acdoll commented 4 months ago

This bot already has access to our collections. Does it have to be granted a particular role to function?

Jegelewicz commented 4 months ago

@acdoll I don't believe so. @dustymc can confirm.