Closed Jegelewicz closed 1 year ago
Agents already exist for most of these. I added the link to the agent in the code table and a link to the code table in the agents
I like this in general (makes sense!) but not to introduce complications, some of the land holders are actually types of land rights like the Bankhead-Jones or Wildlife Refuge System which are administered through one fed agency or another. (also owner and administrator of lands are not always the same).
, some of the land holders are actually types of land rights like the Bankhead-Jones or Wildlife Refuge System
OR (crazy idea!) could we add something to the agents - landholder type (the code table) and create generic agents for the generic landholders?
create generic agents for the generic landholders
Pretty hard "no" from me - "the public" (or "depends who you ask" or ...) are indefensible stretches of the 'identifiable human-based entity' datatype.
yea I agree with Dusty on this -- what is a generic agent anyway?! if it has a profile, not generic by definition. We can have a verbatim agent for that.
Perhaps this needs splitting?
Landholder:specific (VALUE IS an agent) the below get removed from the code table and added as agents
OR (crazy idea!) could we add something to the agents - landholder type (the code table) and create generic agents for the generic landholders?
Originally posted by @Jegelewicz in https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/6470#issuecomment-1613461779