Code Table Request - Add "leaf tissue or cuticle removed"

[WaigePilson]

Initial Request

Goal

Context

Our UWBM Paleobotany and Paleobotany Reference collections contain plant specimens (modern and fossil) which have had their leaf tissue removed from the rock rock matrix and/or cleared so that microscopic and cellular detail can be observed. The current list of preparation methods contain similar processes (mostly DNA extraction) but it seems like this is an opportune place to be able to note these methods for how the leaf tissue has been processed, prepared, and preserved.

Table

https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctpreparation_method

Proposed Value

leaf tissue or cuticle removed

Proposed Definition

leaf tissue or cuticle removed from the plant and/or rock matrix and mounted on microscope slides for observation of anatomical detail (e.g., stomatal density, epidermal cell size)

Priority

High priority, I cannot import legacy parts data until this is resolved

Helpful Actions

• [x] Add the issue to the Code Table Management Project.

• [x] Please reach out to anyone who might be affected by this change. Leave a comment or add this to the Committee agenda if you believe more focused conversation is necessary.

@ArctosDB/arctos-code-table-administrators @Nicole-Ridgwell-NMMNHS @camwebb

Approval

All of the following must be checked before this may proceed.

_The How-To Document should be followed. Pay particular attention to terminology (with emphasis on consistency) and documentation (with emphasis on functionality). No person should act in multiple roles; the submitter cannot also serve as a Code Table Administrator, for example._

• [x] Code Table Administrator[1] - check and initial, comment, or thumbs-up to indicate that the request complies with the how-to documentation and has your approval
• [x] Code Table Administrator[2] - check and initial, comment, or thumbs-up to indicate that the request complies with the how-to documentation and has your approval
• [x] DBA - The request is functionally acceptable. The term is not a functional duplicate, and is compatible with existing data and code.
• [x] DBA - Appropriate code or handlers are in place as necessary. (ID_References, Media Relationships, Encumbrances, etc. require particular attention)

Rejection

If you believe this request should not proceed, explain why here. Suggest any changes that would make the change acceptable, alternate (usually existing) paths to the same goals, etc.

1. Can a suitable solution be found here? If not, proceed to (2)
2. Can a suitable solution be found by Code Table Committee discussion? If not, proceed to (3)
3. Take the discussion to a monthly Arctos Working Group meeting for final resolution.

Implementation

Once all of the Approval Checklist is appropriately checked and there are no Rejection comments, or in special circumstances by decree of the Arctos Working Group, the change may be made.

• [x] Review everything one last time. Ensure the How-To has been followed. Ensure all checks have been made by appropriate personnel.

• [x] Add or revise the code table term/definition as described above. Ensure the URL of this Issue is included in the definition. URLs should be included as text, separated by spaced pipes. Do not include HTML in definitions.

Close this Issue.

DO NOT modify Arctos Authorities in any way before all points in this Issue have been fully addressed; data loss may result.

Special Exemptions

In very specific cases and by prior approval of The Committee, the approval process may be skipped, and implementation requirements may be slightly altered. Please note here if you are proceeding under one of these use cases.

1. Adding an existing term to additional collection types may proceed immediately and without discussion, but doing so may also subject users to future cleanup efforts. If time allows, please review the term and definition as part of this step.
2. The Committee may grant special access on particular tables to particular users. This should be exercised with great caution only after several smooth test cases, and generally limited to "taxonomy-like" data such as International Commission on Stratigraphy terminology.

[WaigePilson]

See also related issues #7798, issues #7799, issues #7801

[Nicole-Ridgwell-NMMNHS]

I support this.

[WaigePilson]

@dustymc @Jegelewicz I think this has the necessary DBA approvals to be added?

[Jegelewicz]

added