Documentation update - geography

[dustymc]

Please complete the form to the best of your ability. This will help us find the document and complete the update.

ArctosDB.org url:

https://handbook.arctosdb.org/documentation/higher-geography.html

The following need to be added/changed/deleted

• [ ] Most everything above Guidelines for Geographic terms in Arctos is wrong.
• [x] https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/5138 is The Plan; it could be turned into documentation

The following could use some more work

• [ ] indicate the section and provide details
• [ ]

No need to complete below this point - these are reminders for the person working on the update

• [x] Add a link to this issue at the top of the document (use "Add to current update request" as the text for the link)
• [x] Add a link to this issue in the Community discussion section of the document (use "Github Issue #X" as the text for the link.)

When the above are complete:

• [x] Comment the link created at the top of the document. (use [//]: # before the link so it will not display on the page, but will remain in the code)
  • [x] Remove the under construction bear banner if it is there

Notify the Arctos Community of the update:

• [ ] Social Media
• [ ] Google Group
• [ ] Newsletter

[Jegelewicz]

The example in the documentation for island gets me this

Same for parks - https://arctos.database.museum/place.cfm?action=detail&geog_auth_rec_id=10004785

Can we get new examples and be sure they will work?

[Jegelewicz]

Can I proceed with deleting everything below "Suggest removing everything below (although some might beuseful for eventual locality attributes?"?

@dusty said

No, some of it needs updated - primarily the guidelines, which can't be addressed until https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/5417 is.

Put under construction bear above that point. But this needs to be made better sooner rather than later. I also need clarification - are FFF's NOT "Unassertable Higher Geography" and if they aren't what are they?

This documentation needs review by @dustymc @sharpphyl @mkoo

[sharpphyl]

I'll be happy to review the documentation but I'll be out of the country from January 18-February 1 with limited internet access. Maybe some of the pending issues will be resolved by that time. I'll check in then.

[mkoo]

This is on my to do list. OK if I draft a new page (that can be swapped for the current?) Or I can archive old so if you hate the new version we have a a way to get back to old version....

[Jegelewicz]

Github has the versions - feel free to replace.