Closed Hwurzburg closed 4 years ago
might be worth including in the readme for each the specific version of ardupilot/arducopter it was tested with, and perhaps the specific realflight version as well..?
We should pare the parameter files down by excluding all default values
We should pare the parameter files down by excluding all default values
Do you know an easy way to do that?
We should pare the parameter files down by excluding all default values
good idea...will add
@Hwurzburg I just realized that the default values aren't even in the parameter metadata, and I don't know how a GCS determines whether a param value is non-default... The autotests have sets of default parameters on a per-frame basis (I think). We can ask @peterbarker if there's a tool to generate a diff between a full set of params and the defaults for a particular frame.
@kd0aij we talked last night....yeah the sim uses a small diff file for the vehicle overlaid on the firmware defaults....what we need is a utility that would take a param file, compare to sim_vehicle params after loading (or any file) and produces a loadable param file for the differences.... tried mavparmdiff.py but takes a lot of hand editing to get rid of unwanted data and reformat into a loadable file...
might be worth including in the readme for each the specific version of ardupilot/arducopter it was tested with, and perhaps the specific realflight version as well..?
sorry wrong quote before...yeah will add that
I have reworked the RF model on the glider in light of the fact that we want it to the the interlink controller as standard and that flightaxis in ArduPilot only can input 8 channels....even though interlink has 13 rc outputs (should consider increasing that...sw e,f,g,h and the button could be used in sims for rc options, passthru to operate direct servos,etc.) did manage to get the brake working using the software radio (which is not required here, but usually is if its a derivative)
Added basic quadcopter
verified DG-800 RFX and param file with Interlink controller in RF8: behaves well: motor deploys on arming with SW7, LG on knob, flaps on SW5, flight mode on SW8
If you find some params that are required for all vehicles we could add them in the code rather than having them in each pram file,
@IamPete1 Will keep that in mind....it might be nice to set the first 12 servo outputs to 1000/2000 for min max instead of only the first few..
okay, ready to go...will also update wiki with new paths, as well as expanding on how this all works
Reorg proposal as we discussed Tridge....and first entry as template.... I re-worked the param file to provide full functionality of all airframe features (brake, airbrake, motor deploy,etc.) I re-worked the model file to add the readme.md text as the model description in RealFlight aircraft selection and to add a camera (independent of environment) to allow inspect of all operating surfaces to facilitate code change verifications
I expect that all proposal for a released model should be tested and all the required elements verified by a third party: Readme for model and include it in RF description box....should state features, output assignments in params, and channel functions (ch 8 should always be mode to match Interlink controller default)..and should have a model specific inspection camera
The goal is to provide newbie's like myself easy ramp on using the model