Closed cclauss closed 5 years ago
Pushed a fix in for this.
sim_vehicle.py is compliant with flake8 sim_vehicle.py
now - should we tighten things up in any way, or just make sure we run things in CI?
Nice fix! Thanks! #10278 finds issues in /modules including UAVCAN/pyuavcan#51 that was just fixed as well. I think for this repo the CI test is good enough for now.
Discovered via #10278
Bug report
flake8 testing of https://github.com/ArduPilot/ardupilot on Python 3.7.1
$ flake8 . --count --select=E901,E999,F821,F822,F823 --show-source --statistics
E901,E999,F821,F822,F823 are the "showstopper" flake8 issues that can halt the runtime with a SyntaxError, NameError, etc. Most other flake8 issues are merely "style violations" -- useful for readability but they do not effect runtime safety.
name
name
in__all__
Issue details
Please describe the problem
Version What version was the issue encountered with
Platform [ ] All [ ] AntennaTracker [ ] Copter [ ] Plane [ ] Rover [ ] Submarine
Airframe type What type of airframe (flying wing, glider, hex, Y6, octa etc)
Hardware type What autopilot hardware was used? (Pixhawk, Cube, Pixracer, Navio2, etc)
Logs Please provide a link to any relevant logs that show the issue