search

ArkEcosystem / desktop-wallet

:computer: Archived, please use ARKVault
https://app.arkvault.io
MIT License
292 stars 191 forks source link

ux: insufficient user feedback when adding recipients to multipayment and other lists #1731

Closed dated closed 4 years ago

dated commented 4 years ago

When adding recipients to a multipayment transaction there is insufficient feedback to the user that the recipient was added correctly.

The first few recipients are obvious, as the user gets to see them added to the list, when the list has reached his max height however the only indication of success is the changed count of items above the list.

As a workaround the list of items could be displayed in reverse, so that a newly added items is added at the top of the list.

To aid this a short animation on the background color or the likes could be added.

The above applies also to the other uses of InputEditableList (seed nodes, multisignature registrations, ...)

ghost commented 4 years ago

Thanks for opening this issue! A maintainer will review this in the next few days and explicitly select labels so you know what's going on.

If no reviewer appears after a week, a reminder will be sent out.

dated commented 4 years ago

mp-animation

Excuse the crappy framerate, but something a little bit like this, @alexbarnsley?

brenopolanski commented 4 years ago

@dated I like your improvements. But testing here I saw that a scroll bar appears vertically or horizontally and immediately disappears when adding or removing an item.

Screenshot from 2020-03-06 14-48-32

Screenshot from 2020-03-06 14-51-27

Peek 2020-03-06 15-00

dated commented 4 years ago

What OS are you on? On MacOS those didn't appear iirc, I'll see if I can get around that somehow.

brenopolanski commented 4 years ago

My Environment

dated commented 4 years ago

Gotcha, thanks for the info. I'll try to set the overflow to hidden during the animation. That should in theory get rid of the scrollbars. Kinda hard to confirm on my end though :joy:

stale[bot] commented 4 years ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

dated commented 4 years ago

:danstop:

stale[bot] commented 4 years ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

dated commented 4 years ago

No no no.

faustbrian commented 4 years ago

Closing, no longer relevant for 3.0