README.md circumventing revision control and verifiability associated to chronological assurances of git

[bitcoinsSG]

Considering the importance of transparency and maintaining an independently verifiable history, it might be beneficial to move the documentation to GitHub or a similar platform that offers robust revision control. This approach would ensure that all changes are tracked in a manner that can be independently audited, enhancing both credibility and collaboration.

[ArmanTheParman]

That'd be ideal, but keeping the markdown version on github consistent with the WordPress html has been too much work, and a distraction from building Parmanode features.