Logos

[spykoulouris]

Data and Information source logo should not appear in merged records from institutions that do not have photos of the artwork.

This is a merged record from I Tatti and Zeri, but several information have the Frick and Midas logo. I guess this is because these terms are reconciled. However, what we want users to see is what is the source for each single piece of information

https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2F0854fba2a02773fd95b25aa26be6a3e88e673f2a

[sophisid]

@spykoulouris so we only need the provider from the original artworks? i think in other meetings we decided to include every provider, in order to enhance the information. @lklic what to do think?

[lklic]

I tend to agree with @spykoulouris, while it's useful to see all of the reconciled institutions, it will be problematic once all of the institutions reconcile some common terms, as we will have a large list of logos that are not really relevant to the specific record.

I would say to only show those institutions that have that piece of data for that specific work.

I know this is problematic with our data model that uses named graphs, you will have to add a statement to the query that will limit it further to say that subject (work) also needs to contain that term. Let's test it with one of the fields and then modify the rest of them-- I know that this will require us to change all of the field definitions. Perhaps we could use this opportunity to create a new field definition called 'information source' that then gets called by other field definitions to populate this data. That way if we need to make a change in the future we only change it in one place rather than all of the field definitions.

[sophisid]

I changed it for the types, probably this problem occurs in more fields, so i will review them one by one

[sophisid]

Here for example: "tela" has been reconciled as In this case what should we do?

[sophisid]

Also in these cases, that all the information comes from the vocab

[spykoulouris]

Here for example: "tela" has been reconciled as In this case what should we do?

In this case the term should be the reconciled one (canvas textile material) with the Zeri logo (because this is where the information comes from)

[spykoulouris]

Also in these cases, that all the information comes from the vocab

In this case the Getty logo should remain as it is, because we use ULAN is the source of these pieces of information (court painters, mathematicians, musicians, etc.)

[sophisid]

Here for example: "tela" has been reconciled as In this case what should we do?

In this case the term should be the reconciled one (canvas textile material) with the Zeri logo (because this is where the information comes from)

In this resource "tela" comes from Zeri, the "canvas textile material" comes from the terms of the alignment tool, that someone reconciled.

[spykoulouris]

Here for example: "tela" has been reconciled as In this case what should we do?

In this case the term should be the reconciled one (canvas textile material) with the Zeri logo (because this is where the information comes from)

In this resource "tela" comes from Zeri, the "canvas textile material" comes from the terms of the alignment tool, that someone reconciled.

I will answer you with two questions:

1) Is the Zeri's term "tela" reconciled against Getty's AAT?

2) Which partner reconciled their term against canvas (textile material)? The logo of that partner should be there. I guess this is one of the German institutions that use Midas.

[sophisid]

1) yes 2) Zeri has reconciled their term "tela" with "textile material"

[spykoulouris]

If Zeri has reconciled their term with "textile materials" we shoudn't see the Midas logo there

[sophisid]

I think this is resolved ? #467 according to this issue only in fields related to creators - persons should the pharos logos appear?