Last known location and Provenance fields

[lwruby]

ONLY the most recent location of a work of art that is given by providers should appear in the "Last Known Location" field. Any other data about where a work of art has been should be in the provenance field. This record is correct:

https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2F61d9eebff6e73e47fda69337713db866fc876296

So is this one: https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2Fc853a8ed0c6679b2128183b623c908b88ec08dc5 Although it

This record is not:

https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2F6778fd25fb6c19ba998059b7528412978c512bee

All except one of the "last known location" should go in the Provenance field under "Former location" not "Acquisition".

[sophisid]

@lwruby is the update right?

[lwruby]

It looks like it is! Although my next question is: In the record below, why does the "last known location" show up first in the provenance field? In this case, is it because the Hertziana did not specify an order for acquisition, or did they give it to you with in reverse chronological order? Do you know?

https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2F6778fd25fb6c19ba998059b7528412978c512bee

[PietroLiuzzo]

I think the literal value in the midas aspekt is not taken in consideration in the data ingestion. may be updating the data this error will not show, may be some of the labels of aspekt aob 28 are not ordered correctly