ArtResearch / artresearch.net

ArtResearch ResearchSpace application hosted at https://artresearch.net
5 stars 1 forks source link

Issues in Zeri artwork dating #491

Open FrancescaMambelli opened 1 year ago

FrancescaMambelli commented 1 year ago

a. When dates in Zeri's original data are accompanied by a specification, e.g. approximately ("ca.", in Italian), these are duplicated in Production date. See:
image https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2F5b909aa8cd7b0717c50424c9d84e5d88ee9f20c1 )

b. There is a problem in displaying date and alternative date. They are duplicated and reported both in Production date and in Production date – Alternative. See: image https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2Fbda09e2f58fcb9720dcf0aadb74a2a05fad396a1 )

In this case, the production date of the painting is 1585 - 1596 (value that you built up by combining our original fields “DTSI” - “DTSF”), while the alternative date is “sec. XVI (1540-1567)”, coming from the single field “ADT”. So: in Production date we should have only “DTSI” - “DTSF”, and in Production date – Alternative only “ADT”.

MinadakisNikos commented 1 year ago

Hi Francesca,

Advance Services is on holidays until 5 of January. As soon as we will be back we will take care of these issues.

Merry Cristmas and Happy Holidays!

Best wishes, Nikos

Nikos

On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 18:29, FrancescaMambelli @.***> wrote:

a. When dates in Zeri's original data are accompanied by a specification, e.g. approximately ("ca.", in Italian), these are duplicated in Production date. See: [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42742627/209367804-43a58a8b-03e1-45ad-8849-beb993437de1.png

https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2F5b909aa8cd7b0717c50424c9d84e5d88ee9f20c1 )

b. There is a problem in displaying date and alternative date. They are duplicated and reported both in Production date and in Production date – Alternative. See: [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42742627/209367872-018e33b9-1281-4235-b590-b09eeaa77828.png

https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fartresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2Fbda09e2f58fcb9720dcf0aadb74a2a05fad396a1 )

In this case, the production date of the painting is 1585 - 1596 (value that you built up by combining our original fields “DTSI” - “DTSF”), while the alternative date is “sec. XVI (1540-1567)”, coming from the single field “ADT”. So: in Production date we should have only “DTSI” - “DTSF”, and in Production date – Alternative only “ADT”.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ArtResearch/artresearch.net/issues/491, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADXWR2QINCMUTKBV2UIUS2TWOXHOVANCNFSM6AAAAAATH4XD4A . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>