Closed spykoulouris closed 2 years ago
This will be added in the next batch update.
So just to make it clear, do we still want to have a2664, a2700 and a2780 as Location? or in the case that we have Zusammenhang ( kind of relation ) to add it in a different field?
<aob26>Zusammenhang
<a2606>07501119</a2606>
<a2664>Assisi</a2664>
<a2690>Klosterkirche</a2690>
<a2700>San Francesco</a2700>
<a2740>Oberkirche</a2740>
<a2780>Langhaus</a2780>
</aob26>
I think what they want is a different field ("Related Document") for a2606 field
@spykoulouris I took a look on this issue and the artwork mentioned, and in the original page of the artwork from KHI http://photothek.khi.fi.it/documents/obj/70003602?medium=70003602%2Ffld0005301x_p#1 it seams that this part :
Beziehung: Obj-Nr. 70003468, Buch, I-08-040
Vorlage: Obj-Nr. 07505463, Zyklus
Beziehung: Obj-Nr. 70003603, Zeichnung
Beziehung: Obj-Nr. 70003601, Bild
looks more like related document.
Are we certain that a2606 is related document? Also if so, how would they like to be presented, could please give me us an example?
Yes a2606 is what they call related document (it is a related artwork). I wrote back to the KHI people and asked them if they just need the a2606 subfield (as they initially suggested) or something more.
Thank you, please let us know what they respond.
I got feedback from the KHI. The field should have label "Related Document" and the value should be the number indicated in subfield a2606. They also ask if that value can be a link to related record mentioned there.
Fixed in mappings, it will be available at the next import.
Example in RS just for this work we are seeing here : https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fpharos.artresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2Fc29a6b8572ecfa8ad371c6f12fe5a4aa859417ed
KHI requests to add additional "related documents" subfields to their records. I think it is better to organize a call with them and clarify exactly what we need to do. These are the fields to add: a2664 a2700 a2750 a5007 a 5008 a 5010
They imagine something like that:
So they wish to make it as shown in the original page of the work? Anyhow, of course we should make a call about it, to make sure we will make it as they wish.
To add extra related documents (to be objects instead of documents), updated as artwork . Example from original data :
<aob26>Zusammenhang
<a2606>07501119</a2606>
<a2664>Assisi</a2664>
<a2690>Klosterkirche</a2690>
<a2700>San Francesco</a2700>
<a2740>Oberkirche</a2740>
<a2780>Langhaus</a2780>
</aob26>
<a5007>Beziehung
<a5008>70003468</a5008>
<a5010>Buch</a5010>
<a501p>I-08-040</a501p>
</a5007>
<a5007>Vorlage
<a5008>07505463</a5008>
<a5010>Zyklus</a5010>
</a5007>
<a5007>Beziehung
<a5008>70003603</a5008>
<a5010>Zeichnung</a5010>
</a5007>
<a5007>Beziehung
<a5008>70003601</a5008>
<a5010>Bild</a5010>
</a5007>
Should we close this ticket? We had a meeting with Almut about it
a5008 is the ID
Please include the two fields for related documents to KHI's records:
aob26 (kind of relation) a2606 (document no.)
example of record: https://artresearch.net/resource/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fpharos.artresearch.net%2Fresource%2Fpharos%2Fartwork%2Fc29a6b8572ecfa8ad371c6f12fe5a4aa859417ed