Closed mpope9 closed 5 years ago
I see:
SALTY_MAX_CLEAN_SIZE is the maximum amount of bytes a nif call can process
* before we should consider invoking the dirty schedulers.
Just curious why you wouldn't use dirty schedulers by default?
Ahh, just read up more on libsodium and dirty schedulers, and it'd probably take more time to dirty schedule than to execute. Closing this issue.
I see that there is the
DIRTY
macro defined but never used. Does this actually useERL_NIF_DIRTY_JOB_CPU_BOUND
?