resultaten vanuit statische data (google drive) zijn niet hetzelfde

[valdemetriades]

Indien we gebruik maken van de statische data en de scripts runnen, krijgen we niet dezelfde resultaten:

• er zijn meer plekken waar helemaal geen DRN/RIV data in het model wordt gezet (géén peil en/of bodemhoogte bekend)
• de verdeling DRN/RIV lijkt anders (bv. HDSR gebied komt er helemaal niet in RIV)

Actie: scripts opnieuw draaien met de statische data en achterhalen waar eventueel een technische mismatch door komt.

Hierbij de resultaten die wij krijgen vanuit de statische data (Google Drive):

[dbrakenhoff]

I can reproduce the above results. Somehow the SUB attribute seems to have changed between the last run for the report and now.

[dbrakenhoff]

The data I'm reading in now only has SUB == 1 in the red areas. So that's the causing the difference in the final result.

So we'll have to figure out why this attribute has changed in the water_areas.shp file. So @d2hydro, any chance you can take a look at that one :)?

[d2hydro]

@dbrakenhoff, can you check if you get the correct results with this waterareas.shp: https://we.tl/t-fo27TgO9XL.

See here the sub on the google drive:

And here the sub in the file on the wetransfer:

I've send this last file via e-mail 18-03-2021. That corresponds with the date on the files and not with the date of the files in google drive.

[dbrakenhoff]

Thanks, that should take care of it.

[dbrakenhoff]

Data on Google Drive has been updated. Now the files reproduce the figures presented in the report. For download, see here.

Closing issue.