Team Grading

[Arushi-maker]

Name	Grades
Ananya A	0.9/1,85
Arushi P	0.9/1.85
Priya S	0.9/1.95
Sumedha K	0.9/1.85

Team Review:

• [x] The team should have a Web Pages that teach: Binary, Data, Data Structures, Data Abstraction

Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions:

• [X] Growth/Accomplishments in work is according to historical Team Plan, or they show revisions to plan according to work
• [X] Short falls/Improvement that could be made in Work or Team Plan, team highlights next steps or improvements that could be made
• [X] Showing key accomplishments according to requirement in Frontend such as Binary Math, ASCII, Unicode, Color Codes, Logic Gates, etc.

• [X] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning.

  Per check: 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond

  Freeform comment: Our team worked together to create two separate games, 2048 and the color game, with an influence on agile methodology. We created a workspace where we started with writing plans in our notebook, and then working on each task separately. We made sure the work was done, by checking on each other as things were being completed. To also help with planning we have used Github Issues to organize and assign tasks.

With the project itself, we originally began with learning what binary is and how to define it in a short section. Then, we began to plan ideas on how to showcase these ideas. We created 2048 and adapted it to display the numbers in binary code instead of an actual number. As for the color game, it uses binary RGB values to change the background color. One of our games showcases binary, while the other uses binary to complete a task.

The only thing we can improve is in frontend for display of the color game, and also adding instructions to the games.

Link to Video: Click Here!

[Ishraqh1]

Team Review:

The team should have a Web Pages that teach: Binary, Data, Data Structures, Data Abstraction Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions:

Growth/Accomplishments in work is according to historical Team Plan, or they show revisions to plan according to work Short falls/Improvement that could be made in Work or Team Plan, team highlights next steps or improvements that could be made Showing key accomplishments according to requirement in Frontend such as Binary Math, ASCII, Unicode, Color Codes, Logic Gates, etc. Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning. Per check: 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond

Score: 0.9

Sumedha: she did a great job in working on the code. She worked on the color wheel and and created code that allows you to enter specific values and squares and created two js files. what i think she could do better for next time is ensure that the front end design looks a bit more aesthetic. I also felt that the two separate js files made it a bit unclera what the actual project was and where the code was placed so if that was a bit more clear that would be nice

[katelync05]

Team Review Katelyn grading Priya

• [x] The team should have a Web Pages that teach: Binary, Data, Data Structures, Data Abstraction.

Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions

• [x] Growth/Accomplishments in work is according to historical Team Plan, or they show revisions to plan according to work
• [x] Short falls/Improvement that could be made in Work or Team Plan, team highlights next steps or improvements that could be made
• [x] Showing key accomplishments according to requirement in Frontend such as Binary Math, ASCII, Unicode, Color Codes, Logic Gates, etc.

• [x] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning.

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Final Score: 0.9

Freeform comment.
Creative project, good work. Incorporating the 2048 game with binary was very interesting, I would play. Honest about improvement, the color game's visual presentation could use some work. Maybe the 2048 game could give a key at the bottom of the game for people who can't read binary that quickly.

[ellierozen]

Individual Review Ellie Rozenkrants grading Arushi Pandey

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Final score: 0.9 above and beyond. -- Wrote the issues for all parts of project. Contributed to 2048 game and color game.

Freeform comment.
Glow: I really like the 2048 game because that is one of my favorite computer games to play so its cool to see it in binary version. Mainly worked on the binary aspect of the 2048 game and the logic for that. Grow: I think maybe adding design elements and maybe color options could be a cool thing to implement and further the project.

[katelync05]

Individual Review Katelyn grading

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Final Score: 0.9

Freeform comment.
She contributed to both games on frontend and binary and created issues for both projects. Video was clear and concise and key commits in Issues are clear. 2048 is my favorite because I love that game. Only critique I can give is that the second feature, the color game is not that visually appealing could use work on frontend.